Midterm pivotal trial results of the Talent Low Profile System for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Analysis of complicated versus uncomplicated aortic necks

被引:33
|
作者
Fairman, RM
Velazquez, OC
Carpenter, JP
Woo, E
Baum, RA
Golden, MA
Kritpracha, B
Criado, F
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19003 USA
[2] Union Mem Hosp, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether a complicated aortic neck is associated with unfavorable outcome fter abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endografting. Methods. In a prospective pivotal clinical trial, 237 consecutive patients underwent implantation of the bifurcated Talent Low Profile System. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with complicated aortic necks (short, < 15 mm; very short, :510 mm; dilated, > 28 mm; angulated, > 45 degrees; calcified; and thrombus-lined) versus those with uncomplicated neck anatomy. Major outcome parameters included procedure time, operative blood loss, transfusion requirements, volume of contrast medium used during the implant procedure, endoleaks, migration, limb patency, AAA regression, conversion to open repair, morbidity, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 620.5 days. Results: Overall, 32% of aortic necks were short, 19% were very short, 20% were dilated, 18% were calcified, 8.5% were thrombus-lined, and 19.9% were angulated. Thirty percent and 70% of patients, respectively, were stratified to the uncomplicated and complicated groups P < .01. Procedure time, operative blood loss, transfusions, volume of contrast medium used in the implant procedure, migration, endograft patency, AAA sac regression, conversion to open repair, and mortality were not significantly different in necks with complicated versus uncomplicated anatomy. At 21 months, sacs were regressing or stable in 98% (complicated) versus 96% (uncomplicated). Primary graft limb patency was 100% in both groups. The endoleak rate was 4.3% (complicated) versus 17% (uncomplicated) at 18 months, but this difference was not statistically significant. Adverse renal events, however, occurred in 27.5% (complicated) versus 13.6% (uncomplicated; P = .04). Conclusions: Complicated aortic neck is not associated with unfavorable outcome at midterm follow-up after AAA endografting. However, statistically more adverse renal events occur in patients with complicated neck anatomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1082
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the OVER trial INVITED COMMENTARY
    Powell, Janet T.
    Epstein, David
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 56 (04) : 910 - 910
  • [42] The ACE trial: A randomized comparison of open versus endovascular repair in good risk patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Becquemin, Jean-Pierre
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (01) : 222 - 224
  • [43] Comparison of Surveillance Versus Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR): Results from a Randomised Trial
    Cao, P.
    De Rango, P.
    Verzini, F.
    Parlani, G.
    Romano, L.
    Cieri, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (01) : 13 - 25
  • [44] Midterm results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: comparison of instruction-for-use (IFU) cases and non-IFU cases
    Motoki Nakai
    Morio Sato
    Hirotatsu Sato
    Hinako Sakaguchi
    Fumihiro Tanaka
    Akira Ikoma
    Hiroki Sanda
    Kouhei Nakata
    Hiroki Minamiguchi
    Nobuyuki Kawai
    Tetsuo Sonomura
    Yoshiharu Nishimura
    Yoshitaka Okamura
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2013, 31 : 585 - 592
  • [45] Midterm results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: comparison of instruction-for-use (IFU) cases and non-IFU cases
    Nakai, Motoki
    Sato, Morio
    Sato, Hirotatsu
    Sakaguchi, Hinako
    Tanaka, Fumihiro
    Ikoma, Akira
    Sanda, Hiroki
    Nakata, Kouhei
    Minamiguchi, Hiroki
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    Sonomura, Tetsuo
    Nishimura, Yoshiharu
    Okamura, Yoshitaka
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 31 (09) : 585 - 592
  • [46] Mid-term results of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients anatomically suitable for endovascular repair
    Becquemin, JP
    Bourriez, A
    D'Audiffret, A
    Zubilewicz, T
    Kobeiter, H
    Allaire, E
    Mellière, D
    Desgranges, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 19 (06) : 656 - 661
  • [47] Results of open pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: single centre series and pooled analysis of literature
    van Lammeren, Guus W.
    Unlu, Cagdas
    Verschoor, Sjoerd
    van Dongen, Eric P.
    Wille, Jan
    van de Pavoordt, Eric D. W. M.
    de Vries-Werson, Debbie A. B.
    De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    VASCULAR, 2017, 25 (03) : 234 - 241
  • [48] A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients
    Becquemin, Jean-Pierre
    Pillet, Jean-Chistophe
    Lescalie, Francois
    Sapoval, Marc
    Goueffic, Yann
    Lermusiaux, Patrick
    Steinmetz, Eric
    Marzelle, Jean
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (05) : 1167 - 1173
  • [49] Risk factors for postoperative death following elective surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: results from the UK Small Aneurysm Trial
    Brady, AR
    Fowkes, FGR
    Greenhalgh, RM
    Powell, JT
    Ruckley, CV
    Thompson, SG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (06) : 742 - 749
  • [50] Quality of life, impotence, and activity level in a randomized trial of immediate repair versus surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Lederle, FA
    Johnson, GR
    Wilson, SE
    Acher, CW
    Ballard, DJ
    Littooy, FN
    Messina, LM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (04) : 745 - 752