Midterm pivotal trial results of the Talent Low Profile System for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Analysis of complicated versus uncomplicated aortic necks

被引:33
|
作者
Fairman, RM
Velazquez, OC
Carpenter, JP
Woo, E
Baum, RA
Golden, MA
Kritpracha, B
Criado, F
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19003 USA
[2] Union Mem Hosp, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether a complicated aortic neck is associated with unfavorable outcome fter abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endografting. Methods. In a prospective pivotal clinical trial, 237 consecutive patients underwent implantation of the bifurcated Talent Low Profile System. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with complicated aortic necks (short, < 15 mm; very short, :510 mm; dilated, > 28 mm; angulated, > 45 degrees; calcified; and thrombus-lined) versus those with uncomplicated neck anatomy. Major outcome parameters included procedure time, operative blood loss, transfusion requirements, volume of contrast medium used during the implant procedure, endoleaks, migration, limb patency, AAA regression, conversion to open repair, morbidity, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 620.5 days. Results: Overall, 32% of aortic necks were short, 19% were very short, 20% were dilated, 18% were calcified, 8.5% were thrombus-lined, and 19.9% were angulated. Thirty percent and 70% of patients, respectively, were stratified to the uncomplicated and complicated groups P < .01. Procedure time, operative blood loss, transfusions, volume of contrast medium used in the implant procedure, migration, endograft patency, AAA sac regression, conversion to open repair, and mortality were not significantly different in necks with complicated versus uncomplicated anatomy. At 21 months, sacs were regressing or stable in 98% (complicated) versus 96% (uncomplicated). Primary graft limb patency was 100% in both groups. The endoleak rate was 4.3% (complicated) versus 17% (uncomplicated) at 18 months, but this difference was not statistically significant. Adverse renal events, however, occurred in 27.5% (complicated) versus 13.6% (uncomplicated; P = .04). Conclusions: Complicated aortic neck is not associated with unfavorable outcome at midterm follow-up after AAA endografting. However, statistically more adverse renal events occur in patients with complicated neck anatomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1082
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term Results Of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Versus Open Repair In Patients With Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Results Of The UK EVAR Trial 1
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Powell, Janet T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Epstein, David
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (13) : B92 - B92
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the OVER trial
    Stroupe, Kevin T.
    Lederle, Frank A.
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Kyriakides, Tassos C.
    Jonk, Yvonne C.
    Ge, Ling
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 56 (04) : 901 - +
  • [23] The Powerlink system for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Six-year results
    Wang, Grace J.
    Carpenter, Jeffrey P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 48 (03) : 535 - 545
  • [24] Endovascular versus conventional open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm: Feasibility and preliminary results
    Hinchliffe, RJ
    Hopkinson, BR
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2002, 9 (06) : 941 - 941
  • [25] Endovascular versus conventional open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm: Feasibility and preliminary results
    van Sambeek, MRHM
    van Dijk, LC
    Hendriks, JM
    van Grotel, M
    Kuiper, JW
    Pattynama, PMT
    van Urk, H
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2002, 9 (04) : 443 - 448
  • [26] A cost-effectiveness analysis of standard versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Forbes, TL
    DeRose, G
    Kribs, S
    Harris, KA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 45 (06) : 420 - 424
  • [27] Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: One-year results of the French AneuRx trial
    Ricco, JB
    Letort, M
    Magnan, PE
    Pacchioni, R
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 16 (06) : 685 - 692
  • [28] Midterm results of a single endovascular device for repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: one centre's experience of the Vanguard device
    Holtham, SJ
    Dugdill, S
    Rose, JDG
    Lees, TA
    Wyatt, MG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (04) : 617 - 617
  • [29] Three-dimensional analysis of enlarging aneurysms after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Gore Excluder Pivotal clinical trial
    Fillinger, M
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 43 (05) : 888 - 895
  • [30] Preliminary Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial of Restrictive Versus Standard Fluid Regime in Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    McArdle, Geralde T.
    McAuley, Daniel F.
    McKinley, Andrew
    Blair, Paul
    Hoper, Margaret
    Harkin, Denis W.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (01) : 28 - 34