Midterm pivotal trial results of the Talent Low Profile System for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Analysis of complicated versus uncomplicated aortic necks

被引:33
|
作者
Fairman, RM
Velazquez, OC
Carpenter, JP
Woo, E
Baum, RA
Golden, MA
Kritpracha, B
Criado, F
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19003 USA
[2] Union Mem Hosp, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether a complicated aortic neck is associated with unfavorable outcome fter abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endografting. Methods. In a prospective pivotal clinical trial, 237 consecutive patients underwent implantation of the bifurcated Talent Low Profile System. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with complicated aortic necks (short, < 15 mm; very short, :510 mm; dilated, > 28 mm; angulated, > 45 degrees; calcified; and thrombus-lined) versus those with uncomplicated neck anatomy. Major outcome parameters included procedure time, operative blood loss, transfusion requirements, volume of contrast medium used during the implant procedure, endoleaks, migration, limb patency, AAA regression, conversion to open repair, morbidity, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 620.5 days. Results: Overall, 32% of aortic necks were short, 19% were very short, 20% were dilated, 18% were calcified, 8.5% were thrombus-lined, and 19.9% were angulated. Thirty percent and 70% of patients, respectively, were stratified to the uncomplicated and complicated groups P < .01. Procedure time, operative blood loss, transfusions, volume of contrast medium used in the implant procedure, migration, endograft patency, AAA sac regression, conversion to open repair, and mortality were not significantly different in necks with complicated versus uncomplicated anatomy. At 21 months, sacs were regressing or stable in 98% (complicated) versus 96% (uncomplicated). Primary graft limb patency was 100% in both groups. The endoleak rate was 4.3% (complicated) versus 17% (uncomplicated) at 18 months, but this difference was not statistically significant. Adverse renal events, however, occurred in 27.5% (complicated) versus 13.6% (uncomplicated; P = .04). Conclusions: Complicated aortic neck is not associated with unfavorable outcome at midterm follow-up after AAA endografting. However, statistically more adverse renal events occur in patients with complicated neck anatomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1082
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of endovascular versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at one year; Results of a randomized trial buskens
    Buskens, E
    Prinssen, M
    Blankensteijn, JD
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (06) : A114 - A114
  • [32] Early and midterm results after open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in a comparative analysis
    Ockert, Stefan
    Schumacher, Hardy
    Boeckler, Dittmar
    Megges, Ines
    Allenberg, Jens-Rainer
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (03) : 324 - 332
  • [33] Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial
    Columbo, Jesse A.
    Kang, Ravinder
    Spangler, Emily L.
    Newhall, Karina
    Brooke, Benjamin S.
    Dosluoglu, Hasan
    Lee, Eugene S.
    Raffetto, Joseph D.
    Henke, Peter K.
    Tang, Gale S.
    Mureebe, Leila
    Kougias, Panagoitis
    Johanning, Jason
    Arya, Shipra
    Scali, Salvatore T.
    Stone, David H.
    Suckow, Bjoern D.
    Orion, Kristine
    Halpern, Vivienne
    O'Connell, Jessica
    Inhat, Daniel
    Nelson, Peter
    Tzeng, Edith
    Zhou, Wei
    Barry, Michael
    Sirovich, Brenda
    Goodney, Philip P.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 65 : 247 - 253
  • [34] Endovascular versus conventional open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm: Feasibility and preliminary results - Reply
    van Sambeek, MRHM
    van Dijk, LC
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2002, 9 (06) : 942 - 942
  • [35] Final Results of the Prospective European Trial of the Endurant Stent Graft for Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Rouwet, E. V.
    Torsello, G.
    de Vries, J. -P. P. M.
    Cuypers, P.
    van Herwaarden, J. A.
    Eckstein, H. -H.
    Beuk, R. J.
    Florek, H. -J.
    Jentjens, R.
    Verhagen, H. J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (04) : 489 - 497
  • [36] Transfemoral endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Results of the North American EVT phase 1 trial
    Moore, WS
    Rutherford, RB
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 23 (04) : 543 - 553
  • [37] A Retrospective Analysis of Comparison of General Versus Regional Anaesthesia for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Yagan, Ozgur
    Ozyilmaz, Kadir
    Tas, Nilay
    Hanci, Volkan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2015, 43 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [38] Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Young
    Kontopodis, Nikolaos
    Gavalaki, Aikaterini
    Galanakis, Nikolaos
    Kantzas, Michalis
    Ioannou, Christos
    Geroulakos, George
    Kakisis, John
    Antoniou, George A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2025, 32 (02) : 276 - 289
  • [39] Treatment of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Parallel Graft-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Retrospective Analysis of a Single Center Experience and Midterm Results
    Adovasio, Roberto
    Chiarandini, Stefano
    Calvagna, Cristiano
    D'Oria, Mario
    Zamolo, Francesca
    Pipitone, Marco Damiano
    Sgorlon, Giada
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 47 : 260 - 265
  • [40] Comparison of EVAR and open repair in patients with small abdominal aortic aneurysms: Can we predict results of the PIVOTAL trial?
    Lall, Purandath
    Gloviczki, Peter
    Agarwal, Gautam
    Duncan, Audra A.
    Kalra, Manju
    Hoskin, Tanya
    Oderich, Gustavo S.
    Bower, Thomas C.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (01) : 52 - 59