Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF

被引:116
|
作者
Leung, KF [1 ]
Wong, WW
Tay, MSM
Chu, MML
Ng, SSW
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Author Head Off, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Kowloon Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
WHOQOL-BREF; interview version; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-004-4772-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The Hong Kong Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF was designed as a self-administered questionnaire and has limitations in clinical application on subjects who have limitations in reading or writing. An interview version is therefore needed to avoid sampling biases in clinical studies. Since there are significant differences in the written Chinese and spoken Cantonese, which is a dialect commonly spoken among people in Hong Kong, and adaptation process for converting the written Chinese into spoken Cantonese was necessary. The interview version was designed to allow administration in both face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode. Methods. Three members of the research team translated the formal written Chinese in the self-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF(HK) into colloquial Cantonese separately. Brief notes extracted from the facet definitions of the WHOQOL-100 were added in brackets after some questions to further explain the intention of the questions. Two series of focus groups were conducted and subsequently the field test version was produced. 329 subjects were recruited by convenient sampling method for the field test. Results. The interview version and the self-administered version was found equivalent. The ICC values of the domain scores ranged from 0.73 in the environment domain to 0.83 in the psychological domain. The face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode of administration were also found equivalent. The ICC for the domain scores ranged from 0.76 in the social interaction domain to 0.84 in the psychological domain. The other psychometric properties of the interview version were found comparable to the self-administered version. Conclusion. The self-administered and the interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF are regarded as identical in group comparison. The authors advise that it is acceptable to use different versions on different subjects in the same study, provided that the same version is applied on the same subject throughout the study.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1419
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of Comprehensive Satisfaction Index (ComSI) and Its Association with WHOQOL-BREF
    Singh, Bhupendra
    Pandey, Nisha Mani
    Mehrotra, Betsy
    Srivastava, Anamika
    Chowdhury, Alok Kumar
    Tiwari, S. C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY MEDICINE, 2019, 41 (06): : 562 - 568
  • [42] Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment
    Harper, A
    Power, M
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (03) : 551 - 558
  • [43] Development, reliability and validity of the Chichewa WHOQOL-BREF in adults in lilongwe, Malawi
    Tim Colbourn
    Gibson Masache
    Jolene Skordis-Worrall
    BMC Research Notes, 5 (1)
  • [44] Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF
    S.K. Min
    K.I. Kim
    C.I. Lee
    Y.C. Jung
    S.Y. Suh
    D.K. Kim
    Quality of Life Research, 2002, 11 : 593 - 600
  • [45] WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-BREF - Manual for the German-language version of WHO instruments for quality of life assessments
    Stieglitz, RD
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 2001, 30 (02): : 138 - 139
  • [46] Validation of the instrument for assessing the quality of life of the World Health Organization: WHOQOL-Bref/libras
    Duarte, Soraya B.
    Ribeiro, Adriana
    Chaveiro, Neuma
    Camey, Suzi
    Barbosa, Maria A.
    Fleck, Marcelo P.
    Porto, Celmo C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 170 - 170
  • [47] Quality of life of Chinese urologists: a cross-sectional study using WHOQOL-BREF
    Wei, Y. B.
    Yin, Z.
    Gao, Y. L.
    Yan, B.
    Wang, Z.
    Yang, J. R.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (03) : 232 - 236
  • [48] VALIDATION OF THE CHINESE VERSION OF PAQLQ IN HONG KONG ASTHMATIC CHILDREN
    Leung, T. F.
    Wong, Eliza L.
    Xu, L. Y.
    Sung, Rita Y.
    Leung, P. C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (09) : 1530 - 1530
  • [49] Validation of the Chinese version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Hong Kong
    Lai, Kelly Y. C.
    Luk, Ernest S. L.
    Leung, Patrick W. L.
    Wong, Ann S. Y.
    Law, Lawrence
    Ho, Karen
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (12) : 1179 - 1186
  • [50] Validation of the Chinese version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Hong Kong
    Kelly Y. C. Lai
    Ernest S. L. Luk
    Patrick W. L. Leung
    Ann S. Y. Wong
    Lawrence Law
    Karen Ho
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2010, 45 : 1179 - 1186