Development and validation of the interview version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF

被引:116
|
作者
Leung, KF [1 ]
Wong, WW
Tay, MSM
Chu, MML
Ng, SSW
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Author Head Off, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Kowloon Hosp, Dept Occupat Therapy, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
WHOQOL-BREF; interview version; quality of life;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-004-4772-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. The Hong Kong Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF was designed as a self-administered questionnaire and has limitations in clinical application on subjects who have limitations in reading or writing. An interview version is therefore needed to avoid sampling biases in clinical studies. Since there are significant differences in the written Chinese and spoken Cantonese, which is a dialect commonly spoken among people in Hong Kong, and adaptation process for converting the written Chinese into spoken Cantonese was necessary. The interview version was designed to allow administration in both face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode. Methods. Three members of the research team translated the formal written Chinese in the self-administered version of the WHOQOL-BREF(HK) into colloquial Cantonese separately. Brief notes extracted from the facet definitions of the WHOQOL-100 were added in brackets after some questions to further explain the intention of the questions. Two series of focus groups were conducted and subsequently the field test version was produced. 329 subjects were recruited by convenient sampling method for the field test. Results. The interview version and the self-administered version was found equivalent. The ICC values of the domain scores ranged from 0.73 in the environment domain to 0.83 in the psychological domain. The face-to-face interview and telephone interview mode of administration were also found equivalent. The ICC for the domain scores ranged from 0.76 in the social interaction domain to 0.84 in the psychological domain. The other psychometric properties of the interview version were found comparable to the self-administered version. Conclusion. The self-administered and the interview version of the WHOQOL-BREF are regarded as identical in group comparison. The authors advise that it is acceptable to use different versions on different subjects in the same study, provided that the same version is applied on the same subject throughout the study.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1419
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Possible error in the Danish version of the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire
    Thomsen, Ane Sondergaard
    Bech, Per
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 71 (07) : 549 - 550
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF in an adult population in Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Tsutsumi, Atsuro
    Izutsu, Takashi
    Kato, Seika
    Islam, Akramul
    Yamada, Helena Sayuri
    Kato, Hiroshi
    Wakai, Susumu
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2006, 60 (04) : 493 - 498
  • [33] FACTOR INVARIANCE OF THE WHOQOL-BREF TAIWAN VERSION ACROSS HEALTHY AND DISEASE GROUPS
    Yao, Kai-Ping G.
    Wu, Chia-Huei
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (09) : 1527 - 1527
  • [34] Validity of the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-BREF in depressed patients using Rasch modelling
    da Rocha, Neusa Sica
    de Almeida Fleck, Marcelo Pio
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2009, 43 (01): : 147 - 153
  • [35] Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire among Chilean older people
    Espinoza, Iris
    Osorio, Paulina
    Jose Torrejon, Maria
    Lucas-Carrasco, Ramona
    Bunout, Daniel
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2011, 139 (05) : 579 - 586
  • [36] Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population
    Kalfoss, Mary H.
    Reidunsdatter, Randi J.
    Kloeckner, Christian A.
    Nilsen, Marianne
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [37] Development of the korean versions of WHO quality of life scale and WHOQOL-BREF
    Min, SK
    Kim, KI
    Lee, CI
    Jung, YC
    Suh, SY
    Kim, DK
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (06) : 593 - 600
  • [38] Identifying the Psychometric Properties of the Malay Version of the WHOQOL-BREF among Employees with Obesity Problem
    Rusyda, Mohd Helma
    Kadir, Nor Ba'yah Abdul
    Ismail, Wan Nur Khairunnisa
    Jalil, Siti Jamiaah Abdul
    Abdullah, Nurul-Azza
    Kasim, Arena Che
    Hoesni, Suzana Mohd
    Manaf, Mohd Rizal Abdul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (12)
  • [39] Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population
    Mary H. Kalfoss
    Randi J. Reidunsdatter
    Christian A. Klöckner
    Marianne Nilsen
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19
  • [40] Construct Validity of the Chinese version of WHOQOL-BREF & Disabilities Module in 1000 adults with disabilities: an Item Response Theory analysis
    He, Zehui
    Fang, Jiqian
    Hao, Yuantao
    Tao, Jianting
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2014,