Comparative Study of Cardiac Output Measurement by Regional Impedance Cardiography and Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Guha, Amrita [1 ]
Arora, Dheeraj [1 ]
Mehta, Yatin [1 ]
机构
[1] Medanta Medicity, Dept Cardiac Anaesthesiol, Gurugram, Haryana, India
关键词
Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring; off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery; regional impedance cardiography; thermodilution; THORACIC ELECTRICAL BIOIMPEDANCE;
D O I
10.4103/aca.aca_44_21
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: An ideal CO monitor should be noninvasive, cost effective, reproducible, reliable during various physiological states. Limited literature is available regarding the noninvasive CO monitoring in open chest surgeries. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the CO measurement by Regional Impedance Cardiography (RIC) and Thermodilution (TD) method in patients undergoing off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB). Settings and Design: We conducted a prospective observational comparative study of CO measurement by the noninvasive RIC method using the NICaS Hemodynamic Navigator system and the gold standard TD method using pulmonary artery catheter in patients undergoing OPCAB. A total of 150 data pair from the two CO monitoring techniques were taken from 15 patients between 40-70 years at various predefined time intervals of the surgery. Patients and Methods: We have tried to find out the accuracy, precision and cost effectiveness of the newer RIC technique. Mean CO, bias and precision were compared for each pair i.e.TD-CO and RIC-CO as recommended by Bland and Altman. The Sensitivity and specificity of cutoff value to predict change in TD-CO was used to create a Receiver operating characteristic or ROC curve. Results: Mean TD-CO values were around 4.52 +/- 1.09 L/min, while mean RIC- CO values were around 4.77 +/- 1.84 L/min. The difference in CO change was found to be statistically not significant (p value 0.667). The bias was small (-0.25). The Bland Altman plot revealed a mean difference of -0.25 litres. The RIC method had a sensitivity of 55.56 % and specificity of 33.33 % in predicting 15% change in CO of TD method and the total diagnostic accuracy was 46.67%. Conclusion: A fair correlation was found between the two techniques. The RIC method may be considered as a promising noninvasive, potentially low cost alternative to the TD technique of hemodynamic measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 342
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Continuous cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery:: pulse-contour analyses vs pulmonary artery thermodilution
    Halvorsen, P. S.
    Sokolovl, A.
    Cvancarova, M.
    Hol, P. K.
    Lundblad, R.
    Tonnessen, T. I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 99 (04) : 484 - 492
  • [22] Comparative study of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery for patients with triple coronary artery disease
    CHEN Xin XU Ming SHI Hongwei MU Xinwei CHEN Zhenqiang QIU Zhibing Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University Nanjing Heart Institute Nanjing PRChina
    介入放射学杂志, 2004, (S2) : 96 - 100
  • [23] Thermodilution cardiac output (CO) monitoring versus direct measurement of aortic flow during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
    Botero, M
    Gravenstein, N
    Briesacher, KS
    Kirby, D
    Hess, P
    Lobato, EB
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (12) : A77 - A77
  • [24] Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output measurement in patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison of FloTrac and PiCCOpluswith intermittent thermodilution
    C Hofer
    D Button
    A Jacomet
    R Alpiger
    R Tavakoli
    A Zollinger
    Critical Care, 10 (Suppl 1):
  • [25] Patency in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery
    Zamvar, V
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2004, 7 (03): : E214 - E215
  • [26] Effectivity of dexamethasone in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery
    Hanafy, Dudy Arman
    Harta, I. Komang Adhi Parama
    Prasetya, I. Made Indra
    Busroh, Pribadi Wiranda
    Soetisna, Tri Wisesa
    Sugisman
    Wartono, Dicky Aligheri
    Tjubandi, Amin
    Herlambang, Bagus
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2021, 29 (05): : 388 - 393
  • [27] Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery - Response
    Maslow, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2000, 14 (05) : 624 - 625
  • [28] Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Bainbridge, Daniel
    Martin, Janet
    Cheng, Davy
    SEMINARS IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2005, 9 (01) : 105 - 111
  • [29] Parasternal block in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a pilot study
    Dhrampal, A
    Ritchie, AJ
    Munday, H
    Charman, S
    Vuylsteke, A
    ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 59 (09) : 937 - 937
  • [30] Comparison of Simultaneous Estimation of Cardiac Output by Four Techniques in Patients Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery-A Prospective Observational Study
    Chakravarthy, Murali
    Jayaprakash, K.
    Kalligudd, Praveen
    Prabhakumar, Dattatreya
    Jawali, Vivek
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 10 (02) : 121 - 126