Advantages of gridless full-field digital mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Nykänen, K [1 ]
Siltanen, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Instrumentarium Corp, Imaging Div, FIN-04301 Tuusula, Finland
关键词
amorphous selenium; X-ray scattering; scatter fraction; scatter-to-primary ratio; full-field digital mammography; point spread function; edge spread function; grid; convolution;
D O I
10.1117/12.479944
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to find out whether the image quality in full-field digital mammography can be improved while lowering the patient dose by removing the anti-scatter grid. Moreover, a fast approximate computational algorithm was developed for determining the scattered field in a real mammogram. The method is non-iterative, robust against noise, and works without modification for any scatter-to-primary ratio. Furthermore, it is computationally effective since it is based on fast Fourier transform (FFT). It was found out that the wide dynamic range of digital detectors leads to decrease in patient dose from 10.9% up to 46.6.% at breast thickness of 2cm and from 0.8% up to 40.8% at breast thickness of 4cm depending on the efficiency of the removed grid. At constant patient dose the increase in contrast-to-noise ratio is 5.8% - 36.9% and 0.4%-30.0% accordingly at those two breast thickness. The convolution-based X-ray scatter model was considered. The developed scatter removal method was demonstrated with simulated mammograms and applied to clinical full-field digital mammograms acquired with a high-end digital flat panel detector based on amorphous selenium. Errors in reconstructed scattered fields were 0.3% in case of an ideal simulated mammogram and 7.4% in case of a real simulated mammogram (3cm breast). Applications where the scattered field needs to be determined include 3-D mammography and dual-energy breast imaging. In screening mammography gray-scale optimization eliminates the effect of scattering.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Connor, S. J.
    Lim, Y. Y.
    Tate, C.
    Entwistle, H.
    Morris, J.
    Whiteside, S.
    Sergeant, J.
    Wilson, M.
    Beetles, U.
    Boggis, C.
    Gilbert, F.
    Astley, S.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14
  • [42] A comparison of reading times in full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    SJ Connor
    YY Lim
    C Tate
    H Entwistle
    J Morris
    S Whiteside
    J Sergeant
    M Wilson
    U Beetles
    C Boggis
    F Gilbert
    S Astley
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [43] Breast mass classification on full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography
    Shi, Jiazheng
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Ge, Jun
    Wei, Jun
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 371 - 377
  • [44] Full-field digital mammography in comparison to screen-film mammography - A phantom study
    Obenauer, S
    Schorn, C
    Funke, M
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    Hermann, KP
    IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 499 - 503
  • [45] Clinical performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 283
  • [46] Comparison of Mass Size Measurements: Synthesized Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Sendur, Halit Nahit
    Cerit, Mahi Nur
    Gultekin, Serap
    Cindil, Emetullah
    Kilic, Pinar
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 766 - 773
  • [47] Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kwak, Jin Young
    Son, Eun Ju
    Youk, Ji Hyun
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Han, Mooyoung
    Oh, Ki Keun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) : 310 - 317
  • [48] A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Michell, M. J.
    Iqbal, A.
    Wasan, R. K.
    Evans, D. R.
    Peacock, C.
    Lawinski, C. P.
    Douiri, A.
    Wilson, R.
    Whelehan, P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (10) : 976 - 981
  • [49] Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
    Min Jung Kim
    Eun-Kyung Kim
    Jin Young Kwak
    Eun Ju Son
    Ji Hyun Youk
    Seon Hyeong Choi
    Mooyoung Han
    Ki Keun Oh
    European Radiology, 2009, 19 : 310 - 317
  • [50] FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY - SYSTEM-DEVELOPMENT AND IMAGE EVALUATION
    FEIG, SA
    YAFFE, MJ
    PLEWES, DB
    MAIDMENT, AD
    MAWDSLEY, GE
    JONG, RA
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 170 - 170