Advantages of gridless full-field digital mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Nykänen, K [1 ]
Siltanen, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Instrumentarium Corp, Imaging Div, FIN-04301 Tuusula, Finland
关键词
amorphous selenium; X-ray scattering; scatter fraction; scatter-to-primary ratio; full-field digital mammography; point spread function; edge spread function; grid; convolution;
D O I
10.1117/12.479944
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of the study was to find out whether the image quality in full-field digital mammography can be improved while lowering the patient dose by removing the anti-scatter grid. Moreover, a fast approximate computational algorithm was developed for determining the scattered field in a real mammogram. The method is non-iterative, robust against noise, and works without modification for any scatter-to-primary ratio. Furthermore, it is computationally effective since it is based on fast Fourier transform (FFT). It was found out that the wide dynamic range of digital detectors leads to decrease in patient dose from 10.9% up to 46.6.% at breast thickness of 2cm and from 0.8% up to 40.8% at breast thickness of 4cm depending on the efficiency of the removed grid. At constant patient dose the increase in contrast-to-noise ratio is 5.8% - 36.9% and 0.4%-30.0% accordingly at those two breast thickness. The convolution-based X-ray scatter model was considered. The developed scatter removal method was demonstrated with simulated mammograms and applied to clinical full-field digital mammograms acquired with a high-end digital flat panel detector based on amorphous selenium. Errors in reconstructed scattered fields were 0.3% in case of an ideal simulated mammogram and 7.4% in case of a real simulated mammogram (3cm breast). Applications where the scattered field needs to be determined include 3-D mammography and dual-energy breast imaging. In screening mammography gray-scale optimization eliminates the effect of scattering.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A clinical survey of patient dose in full-field digital mammography
    Hermann, K
    Obenauer, S
    Marten, K
    Kehbel, S
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, EH
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 269 - 269
  • [32] Clinical evaluation of full-field digital mammography in a screening population
    Lewin, JM
    Hendrick, RE
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, P
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 199 - 199
  • [33] Value and importance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for screening
    Grabbe, E
    Fischer, U
    Funke, M
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Baum, F
    RADIOLOGE, 2001, 41 (04): : 359 - 365
  • [34] Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey
    Gennaro, G
    Baldelli, P
    Taibi, A
    Di Maggio, C
    Gambaccini, M
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (04) : 645 - 652
  • [35] Evaluation of a direct conversion full-field digital mammography detector
    Lee, DL
    Yorker, JG
    Jing, Z
    Hoffberg, MG
    Jeromin, LS
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 463 - 464
  • [36] Automatic evaluation of breast density for full-field digital mammography
    Lou, SL
    Fan, Y
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2000, 3979 : 1362 - 1369
  • [37] Significance of additional spot magnification in full-field digital mammography
    Hermann, K
    Obenauer, S
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, EH
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 268 - 268
  • [38] A comparative evaluation of two full-field digital mammography units
    D Smith
    CP Lawinski
    A Mackenzie
    DS Evans
    NSA Wells
    D Emerton
    CA Lewis
    Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [39] Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey
    Gisella Gennaro
    Paola Baldelli
    Angelo Taibi
    Cosimo Di Maggio
    Mauro Gambaccini
    European Radiology, 2004, 14 : 645 - 652
  • [40] Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Cochon, Laila R.
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Khorasani, Ramin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (08) : 999 - 1003