Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening

被引:90
|
作者
Sihto, Hard [2 ]
Lundin, Johan [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lehtimaki, Tina [1 ]
Sarlomo-Rikala, Maarit [6 ]
Butzow, Ralf [3 ,6 ]
Holli, Kaija [7 ]
Sailas, Liisa [9 ]
Kataja, Vesa [9 ,10 ]
Lundin, Mikael [1 ]
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Thina [11 ]
Isola, Jorma [8 ]
Heikkila, Paivi [6 ]
Joensuu, Heikki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Biomedicum, Mol Oncol Lab, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oncol, Biomed Informat Res Grp, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Folkhalsan Res Ctr, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Pathol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[7] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med & Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[8] Tampere Univ Hosp, Inst Med Technol, Tampere, Finland
[9] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Vaasa, Finland
[10] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[11] Oulu Univ, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiol, SF-90220 Oulu, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The frequency and significance of gene expression profile-derived molecular subtypes of breast cancers found in mammography screening are unknown. Experimental Design: We identified breast cancers diagnosed in women of any age living in defined geographic regions in Finland in 1991 to 1992 and collected clinical and pathologic data. Surrogates for the molecular subtypes were determined for 247 cancers found in organized mammography screening and 989 cancers detected outside of screening using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. Molecular subtypes were defined as luminal A [estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, HER2-], luminal B (ER+ and/ or PR+, HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-, cytokeratin 5+, and/or HER1+), HER2+/ER(ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and unclassified. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years. Results: The luminal type A was common (73.7%) and the HER2+/ER- type is rare (5.7%) in screen-detected cancer, and only 16% were HER2 positive. Women with cancer diagnosed in screening at ages 50 to 69 years had similar molecular subtype distribution as women whose cancer was found outside of screening at age >69 years. In a multivariate model, cancer detection at screening independently predicted favorable distant disease-free survival when the molecular subtype was included as a covariate in addition to age, histologic grade, and cancer size. Women with small (pT(1)N(0)M(0)) HER2-positive cancer had similar outcome regardless of the method of detection. Conclusions: Molecular subtype distribution of screen-detected breast cancer differs from that of cancers found outside of screening and accounts in part for the better outcome of screen-detected cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:4103 / 4110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ULTRASOUND DEMONSTRATION OF SMALL BREAST CANCERS DETECTED BY MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING
    POTTERTON, AJ
    PEAKMAN, DJ
    YOUNG, JR
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (11) : 808 - 813
  • [42] COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY OF PREVALENT AND INCIDENT CANCERS DETECTED BY BREAST SCREENING
    ANDERSON, TJ
    ALEXANDER, F
    CHETTY, U
    KIRKPATRICK, A
    ROBERTS, MM
    LAMB, J
    LUTZ, W
    FORREST, APM
    MUIR, B
    HUGGINS, A
    LANCET, 1986, 1 (8480): : 519 - 523
  • [43] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Carl A Tupper
    Anthony J Maxwell
    Susan Astley
    Megan Bydder
    Soujanya Gadde
    Elaine Harkness
    Yit Y Lim
    Mary Wilson
    Julie Morris
    Breast Cancer Research, 17
  • [44] Interval breast cancers in screening: The effect of mammography review method on classification
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Catarzi, Sandra
    Lamberini, Maria Perla
    Risso, Gabriella
    Saguatti, Gianni
    Abbattista, Teresa
    Martinelli, Francesca
    Houssami, Nehmat
    BREAST, 2007, 16 (06): : 646 - 652
  • [45] ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    BIRD, RE
    WALLACE, TW
    YANKASKAS, BC
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) : 613 - 617
  • [46] Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers
    Niraula, Saroj
    Biswanger, Natalie
    Hu, PingZhao
    Lambert, Pascal
    Decker, Kathleen
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (09)
  • [47] AI in breast screening mammography: breast screening readers' perspectives
    Clarisse Florence de Vries
    Samantha J. Colosimo
    Moragh Boyle
    Gerald Lip
    Lesley A. Anderson
    Roger T. Staff
    Insights into Imaging, 13
  • [48] AI in breast screening mammography: breast screening readers' perspectives
    de Vries, Clarisse Florence
    Colosimo, Samantha
    Boyle, Moragh
    Lip, Gerald
    Anderson, Lesley
    Staff, Roger
    iCAIRD Radiology Collaboration
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [49] Molecular profiles of screen detected breast cancers: Final results of Turkish Bahcesehir breast cancer screening project
    Cabioglu, N.
    Ozkan-Gurdal, S.
    Kayhan, A.
    Ozaydin, N.
    Ozcinar, B.
    Aribal, E.
    Ozmen, V.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [50] Risk Factors for Second Screen-Detected or Interval Breast Cancers in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer Participating in Mammography Screening
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Abraham, Linn A.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Irwig, Les
    Lee, Janie
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2013, 22 (05) : 946 - 961