Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening

被引:90
|
作者
Sihto, Hard [2 ]
Lundin, Johan [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lehtimaki, Tina [1 ]
Sarlomo-Rikala, Maarit [6 ]
Butzow, Ralf [3 ,6 ]
Holli, Kaija [7 ]
Sailas, Liisa [9 ]
Kataja, Vesa [9 ,10 ]
Lundin, Mikael [1 ]
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Thina [11 ]
Isola, Jorma [8 ]
Heikkila, Paivi [6 ]
Joensuu, Heikki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Biomedicum, Mol Oncol Lab, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oncol, Biomed Informat Res Grp, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Folkhalsan Res Ctr, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Pathol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[7] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med & Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[8] Tampere Univ Hosp, Inst Med Technol, Tampere, Finland
[9] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Vaasa, Finland
[10] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[11] Oulu Univ, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiol, SF-90220 Oulu, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The frequency and significance of gene expression profile-derived molecular subtypes of breast cancers found in mammography screening are unknown. Experimental Design: We identified breast cancers diagnosed in women of any age living in defined geographic regions in Finland in 1991 to 1992 and collected clinical and pathologic data. Surrogates for the molecular subtypes were determined for 247 cancers found in organized mammography screening and 989 cancers detected outside of screening using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. Molecular subtypes were defined as luminal A [estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, HER2-], luminal B (ER+ and/ or PR+, HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-, cytokeratin 5+, and/or HER1+), HER2+/ER(ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and unclassified. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years. Results: The luminal type A was common (73.7%) and the HER2+/ER- type is rare (5.7%) in screen-detected cancer, and only 16% were HER2 positive. Women with cancer diagnosed in screening at ages 50 to 69 years had similar molecular subtype distribution as women whose cancer was found outside of screening at age >69 years. In a multivariate model, cancer detection at screening independently predicted favorable distant disease-free survival when the molecular subtype was included as a covariate in addition to age, histologic grade, and cancer size. Women with small (pT(1)N(0)M(0)) HER2-positive cancer had similar outcome regardless of the method of detection. Conclusions: Molecular subtype distribution of screen-detected breast cancer differs from that of cancers found outside of screening and accounts in part for the better outcome of screen-detected cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:4103 / 4110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?
    Stefanie Weigel
    Cornelis Biesheuvel
    Shoma Berkemeyer
    Harald Kugel
    Walter Heindel
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 684 - 691
  • [32] Digital mammography screening: how many breast cancers are additionally detected by bilateral ultrasound examination during assessment?
    Weigel, Stefanie
    Biesheuvel, Cornelis
    Berkemeyer, Shoma
    Kugel, Harald
    Heindel, Walter
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (03) : 684 - 691
  • [33] Breast symptoms and risk of interval breast cancers in mammography-screening programme
    Singh, D.
    Miettinen, J.
    Duffy, S.
    Malila, N.
    Pitkaniemi, J.
    Anttila, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 92 : S11 - S11
  • [34] Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtypes depending on Participation in Mammography Screening Program
    Mathys, Britta
    Urbschat, Iris
    Kieschke, Joachim
    Hecht, Gerold
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 45 (SUPPL 3) : 27 - 27
  • [35] Molecular profiles of screen-detected breast cancers from a Turkish breast cancer screening program
    Cabioglu, Neslihan
    Gurdal, Sibel Ozkan
    Kayhan, Arda
    Ozaydin, Nilufer
    Aribal, Erkin
    Ozmen, Vahit
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [36] Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography
    Dang, Pragya A.
    Wang, Aijia
    Senapati, Gunjan M.
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Giess, Catherine S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (03) : 701 - 706
  • [37] Open surgical biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions detected on screening mammography
    Markopoulos, C
    Kouskos, E
    Revenas, K
    Mantas, D
    Antonopoulou, Z
    Kontzoglou, K
    Nikiteas, N
    Kyriakou, V
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 26 (03) : 311 - 314
  • [38] Mammographic density and the size of breast cancers detected by programmatic screening
    不详
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 4 (02): : 55 - 55
  • [39] Breast cancer screening: Biology of tumors detected by analog and digital mammography
    Drukker, Caroline
    Schmidt, Marjanka
    Rutgers, Emiel J.
    Cardoso, Fatima
    Kerlikowska, Karia
    Esserman, Laura
    Slaets, Leen
    Bogaerts, Jan
    van 't Veer, Laura J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [40] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Tupper, Carl A.
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Astley, Susan
    Bydder, Megan
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Harkness, Elaine
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Wilson, Mary
    Morris, Julie
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17