Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening

被引:90
|
作者
Sihto, Hard [2 ]
Lundin, Johan [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lehtimaki, Tina [1 ]
Sarlomo-Rikala, Maarit [6 ]
Butzow, Ralf [3 ,6 ]
Holli, Kaija [7 ]
Sailas, Liisa [9 ]
Kataja, Vesa [9 ,10 ]
Lundin, Mikael [1 ]
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, Thina [11 ]
Isola, Jorma [8 ]
Heikkila, Paivi [6 ]
Joensuu, Heikki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Biomedicum, Mol Oncol Lab, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oncol, Biomed Informat Res Grp, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Folkhalsan Res Ctr, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Pathol, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[7] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Med & Oncol, Tampere, Finland
[8] Tampere Univ Hosp, Inst Med Technol, Tampere, Finland
[9] Vaasa Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol, Vaasa, Finland
[10] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[11] Oulu Univ, Cent Hosp, Dept Oncol & Radiol, SF-90220 Oulu, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The frequency and significance of gene expression profile-derived molecular subtypes of breast cancers found in mammography screening are unknown. Experimental Design: We identified breast cancers diagnosed in women of any age living in defined geographic regions in Finland in 1991 to 1992 and collected clinical and pathologic data. Surrogates for the molecular subtypes were determined for 247 cancers found in organized mammography screening and 989 cancers detected outside of screening using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. Molecular subtypes were defined as luminal A [estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive, HER2-], luminal B (ER+ and/ or PR+, HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-, cytokeratin 5+, and/or HER1+), HER2+/ER(ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and unclassified. The median follow-up time was 9.4 years. Results: The luminal type A was common (73.7%) and the HER2+/ER- type is rare (5.7%) in screen-detected cancer, and only 16% were HER2 positive. Women with cancer diagnosed in screening at ages 50 to 69 years had similar molecular subtype distribution as women whose cancer was found outside of screening at age >69 years. In a multivariate model, cancer detection at screening independently predicted favorable distant disease-free survival when the molecular subtype was included as a covariate in addition to age, histologic grade, and cancer size. Women with small (pT(1)N(0)M(0)) HER2-positive cancer had similar outcome regardless of the method of detection. Conclusions: Molecular subtype distribution of screen-detected breast cancer differs from that of cancers found outside of screening and accounts in part for the better outcome of screen-detected cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:4103 / 4110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence Improves Detection of Supplemental Screening Ultrasound-detected Breast Cancers in Mammography
    Yoen, Heera
    Chang, Jung Min
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2023, 26 (05) : 504 - 513
  • [22] PB.41: Audit of screening-detected breast cancers with discordant interpretations on double-read screening mammography
    B Batohi
    R Rahim
    M Adejolu
    M Michell
    Breast Cancer Research, 15
  • [23] Screening mammography-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic features based on breast cancer subtypes
    Kim, Mi Young
    Kim, Hyeon Sook
    Choi, Nami
    Yang, Jung-Hyun
    Yoo, Young Bum
    Park, Kyoung Sik
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (06) : 983 - 986
  • [24] Mammographic characteristics of 111 missed cancers later detected by screening mammography
    Birdwell, RL
    Ikeda, DM
    O'Shaughnessy, KF
    Sickles, EA
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 240 - 240
  • [25] Clinicopathological and radiological characteristics of screening ultrasound-detected breast cancers with negative mammography findings.
    Hwang, SE
    Han, WS
    Cho, N
    Park, IA
    Hwang, KT
    Lee, JE
    Shin, HJ
    Kim, SW
    Moon, WK
    Noh, DY
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 94 : S209 - S209
  • [26] Risk Models to Predict Screen-Detected and Interval Breast Cancers in Population Mammography Screening Participants
    Noguchi, Naomi
    Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
    Marinovich, Michael Luke
    Louw, Dominique Claire
    Wylie, Elizabeth Jane
    Houssami, Nehmat
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [27] Dracunculiasis: a rare cause of breast calcification detected on screening mammography
    Hamilton, LJ
    Evans, AJ
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 59 (02) : 205 - 206
  • [28] Breast Cancer Detected with Screening US: Reasons for Nondetection at Mammography
    Bae, Min Sun
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Chang, Jung Min
    Koo, Hye Ryoung
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Cho, Nariya
    Yi, Ann
    Yun, Bo La
    Lee, Su Hyun
    Kim, Mi Young
    Ryu, Eun Bi
    Seo, Mirinae
    RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (02) : 369 - 377
  • [29] Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography
    Lai, Yi-Chen
    Ray, Kimberly M.
    Lee, Amie Y.
    Hayward, Jessica H.
    Freimanis, Rita I.
    Lobach, Iryna V.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [30] Comparison of Cancers Detected by Screening Breast Ultrasound and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Arieno, Andrea
    Santacroce, Amanda
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) : 339 - 347