Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers

被引:128
|
作者
Park, Sung Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Dae Chul [1 ,2 ]
Oh, Young Taik [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Nam Hoon [3 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [4 ]
Rha, Koon Ho [4 ,5 ]
Hong, Sung Joon [4 ]
Han, Kyunghwa
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Avison Biomed Res Ctr, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TARGETED BIOPSY; SCORING SYSTEM; GUIDED BIOPSY; MRI; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.16151133
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score >= 4 or not) was investigated by using k statistics. Results: At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PIRADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted k = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion: The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (C) RSNA, 2016
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 116
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVALUATION OF PI-RADS VERSION 2.1 VS. 2.0 FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN
    Mitchell, M. Huang
    Kathryn, E. Fink
    Li Eric, V.
    Mohammad, R. Siddiqui
    Nicole, Handa
    Ridwan, Alam
    Anugayarthi, Jawahar
    Edward, M. Schaeffer
    Ashley, E. Ross
    Hiten, D. Patel
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 43 (03) : 75 - 76
  • [32] Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer
    Xiaoting Wei
    Jianmin Xu
    Shuyuan Zhong
    Jinsen Zou
    Zhiqiang Cheng
    Zhiguang Ding
    Xuhui Zhou
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 3574 - 3582
  • [33] Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer
    Wei, Xiaoting
    Xu, Jianmin
    Zhong, Shuyuan
    Zou, Jinsen
    Cheng, Zhiqiang
    Ding, Zhiguang
    Zhou, Xuhui
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (10) : 3574 - 3582
  • [34] CLINICAL UTILITY OF PSA DENSITY AND PI-RADS FOR DEFERRING BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Truong, Matthew
    Stevens, Erica
    Ward, Ryan
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Austhof, Ethan
    Valdez, Rogelio
    Purysko, Andrei
    Klein, Eric
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1104 - E1104
  • [35] Editorial for "MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Predict of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions"
    Nketiah, Gabriel A.
    Bathen, Tone F.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (05) : 1474 - 1475
  • [36] Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Walker, Stephanie M.
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Harmon, Stephanie A.
    Sanford, Thomas
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 215 (05) : 1098 - 1103
  • [37] Transverse prostate maximum sectional area can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Gaudiano, Caterina
    Braccischi, Lorenzo
    Taninokuchi Tomassoni, Makoto
    Paccapelo, Alexandro
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Corcioni, Beniamino
    Ciccarese, Federica
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Droghetti, Matteo
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Golfieri, Rita
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [38] Validation of PI-RADS Version 2 in Transition Zone Lesions for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Thai, Janice N.
    Narayanan, Harish A.
    George, Arvin K.
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Shah, Parita
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (02) : 485 - 491
  • [39] PI-RADS Version 2 Is an Excellent Screening Tool for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer as Designated by the Validated International Society of Urological Pathology Criteria: A Retrospective Analysis
    Daun, Mitchell
    Fardin, Sara
    Ushinsky, Alexander
    Batra, Sahil
    Nguyentat, Michael
    Lee, Thomas
    Uchio, Edward
    Lall, Chandana
    Houshyar, Roozbeh
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (06) : 407 - 411
  • [40] CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE BY PI-RADS SCORE AND PSA-DENSITY: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS
    Feuer, Zachary
    Huang, Richard
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Wysock, James
    Huang, William
    Taneja, Samir
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E993 - E994