Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers

被引:128
|
作者
Park, Sung Yoon [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Dae Chul [1 ,2 ]
Oh, Young Taik [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Nam Hoon [3 ]
Choi, Young Deuk [4 ]
Rha, Koon Ho [4 ,5 ]
Hong, Sung Joon [4 ]
Han, Kyunghwa
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pathol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Avison Biomed Res Ctr, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TARGETED BIOPSY; SCORING SYSTEM; GUIDED BIOPSY; MRI; BENIGN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.16151133
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score >= 4 or not) was investigated by using k statistics. Results: At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PIRADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted k = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion: The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (C) RSNA, 2016
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 116
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Magnetic Resonance Elastography Combined With PI-RADS v2.1 for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Chen, Jie
    Chen, Yuntian
    Chen, Guoyong
    Deng, Liping
    Yuan, Yuan
    Tang, Hehan
    Zhang, Zhen
    Chen, Tingyu
    Zeng, Hao
    Yuan, Enyu
    Yin, Meng
    Chen, Jun
    Song, Bin
    Yao, Jin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024,
  • [42] Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers
    Wei, Chao-gang
    Zhang, Yue-yue
    Pan, Peng
    Chen, Tong
    Yu, Hong-chang
    Dai, Guang-cheng
    Tu, Jian
    Yang, Shuo
    Zhao, Wen-lu
    Shen, Jun-kang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (05) : 1247 - 1256
  • [43] Are upgraded DCE-positive PI-RADS 3 lesions truly suspicious for clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Patrick Asbach
    Anwar R. Padhani
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 5825 - 5827
  • [44] Are upgraded DCE-positive PI-RADS 3 lesions truly suspicious for clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Asbach, Patrick
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (08) : 5825 - 5827
  • [45] Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Tavakoli, Anoshirwan Andrej
    Hielscher, Thomas
    Badura, Patrick
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Gnirs, Regula
    Schwab, Constantin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Bonekamp, David
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (01) : 186 - 199
  • [46] Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance
    Kornberg, Zachary
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Chan, June M.
    Zhao, Shoujun
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (02): : 300 - 306
  • [47] The function of Prostate Health Index in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in the PI-RADS 3 population: a multicenter prospective study
    Zhou, Yongheng
    Fu, Qiang
    Shao, Zhiqiang
    Qi, Wenqiang
    Zhong, Minglei
    Lv, Guangda
    Jiang, Zhiwen
    Zhu, Meikai
    Wang, Wenfu
    Shi, Benkang
    Chen, Shouzhen
    Zhu, Yaofeng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (2) : 455 - 461
  • [48] Impact of enema prep on the false-negative rate of a PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer
    H. Patel
    F. Ahmed
    L. Luk
    B. Navot
    H. Shaish
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2494 - 2499
  • [49] Impact of enema prep on the false-negative rate of a PI-RADS 1 MRI of the prostate for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Patel, H.
    Ahmed, F.
    Luk, L.
    Navot, B.
    Shaish, H.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (07) : 2494 - 2499
  • [50] The function of Prostate Health Index in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in the PI-RADS 3 population: a multicenter prospective study
    Yongheng Zhou
    Qiang Fu
    Zhiqiang Shao
    Wenqiang Qi
    Minglei Zhong
    Guangda Lv
    Zhiwen Jiang
    Meikai Zhu
    Wenfu Wang
    Benkang Shi
    Shouzhen Chen
    Yaofeng Zhu
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 455 - 461