A theoretical study of CsI:Tl columnar scintillator image quality parameters by analytical modeling

被引:12
|
作者
Kalyvas, N. [1 ]
Valais, I. [1 ]
Michail, C. [1 ]
Fountos, G. [1 ]
Kandarakis, I. [1 ]
Cavouras, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst TEI Athens, Dept Biomed Engn, Athens 12210, Greece
关键词
CsI:Tl; Columnar phosphors; Modeling; MTF; DQE; FLAT-PANEL IMAGER; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; RAY; EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE; DETECTOR; NOISE; PHOSPHORS; QUANTUM; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.027
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Medical X-ray digital imaging systems such as mammography, radiography and computed tomography (CT), are composed from efficient radiation detectors, which can transform the X-rays to electron signal. Scintillators are materials that emit light when excited by X-rays and incorporated in X-ray medical imaging detectors. Columnar scintillator, like CsI:Tl is very often used for X-ray detection due to its higher performance. The columnar form limits the lateral spread of the optical photons to the scintillator output, thus it demonstrates superior spatial resolution compared to granular scintillators. The aim of this work is to provide an analytical model for calculating the MTF, the DQE and the emission efficiency of a columnar scintillator. The model parameters were validated against published Monte Carlo data The model was able to predict the overall performance of CsliTl scintillators and suggested an optimum thickness of 300 pm for radiography applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 24
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Objective and subjective measurement and modeling of image quality: A case study
    Keelan, Brian W.
    APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XXXIII, 2010, 7798
  • [32] A new spectroscopic imager for X-rays from 0.5 keV to 150 keV coupling a fully depleted pnCCD to a columnar CsI(Tl) scintillator achieving Fano-noise-limited energy resolution and deep subpixel spatial resolution
    Schlosser, Dieter M.
    Hartmann, Robert
    Bechteler, Alois
    Holl, Peter
    Shokr, M.
    Pietsch, Ullrich
    Struder, Lothar
    SPACE TELESCOPES AND INSTRUMENTATION 2020: ULTRAVIOLET TO GAMMA RAY, 2021, 11444
  • [33] Theoretical Study of Modeling Parameters for the Non-Polar Zinc Oxide Surface
    Lima, I. P.
    Martins, J. B. L.
    REVISTA VIRTUAL DE QUIMICA, 2016, 8 (02) : 384 - 393
  • [34] Theoretical study and physical tests on the influence of process parameters of needle on dispensing quality
    Cao L.
    Gong S.G.
    Duan S.Y.
    Tao Y.R.
    Optik, 2023, 287
  • [35] A THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF LENS CENTRING ERRORS AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON OPTICAL IMAGE QUALITY
    HOPKINS, HH
    TIZIANI, HJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1966, 17 (01): : 33 - &
  • [36] The theoretical study of the analytical potential energy functions, spectroscopic parameters and vibrational spectra of GeO molecules
    Wang, Ji-Chang
    Yu, Yong-Jiang
    FERROELECTRICS, 2024, 618 (9-10) : 1742 - 1750
  • [37] A Comparative Modeling Study of Quince Infrared Drying and Evaluation of Quality Parameters
    Ziaforoughi, Amin
    Yousefi, Ali Reza
    Razavi, Seyed M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2016, 12 (09) : 901 - 910
  • [38] The effect of scatter and glare on image quality in contrast-enhanced breast imaging using an a-Si/CsI(Tl) full-field flat panel detector
    Carton, Ann-Katherine
    Acciavatti, Raymond
    Kuo, Johnny
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (03) : 920 - 928
  • [39] A Novel Method to Model Image Creation Based on Mammographic Sensors Performance Parameters: A Theoretical Study
    Kalyvas, Nektarios
    Chamogeorgaki, Anastasia
    Michail, Christos
    Skouroliakou, Aikaterini
    Liaparinos, Panagiotis
    Valais, Ioannis
    Fountos, George
    Kandarakis, Ioannis
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (04)
  • [40] A phantom study on usefulness of modifying image parameters to reduce radiation exposure and maintain image quality in chest HRCT
    Kim, Hyeonju
    Lee, Junho
    Yoon, Joon
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 86 : 89 - 93