Experimental validation of the dual parameter beam quality specifier for reference dosimetry in flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams

被引:3
|
作者
Simpson, Emma [1 ]
Gajewski, Romuald [1 ]
Flower, Emily [1 ]
Stensmyr, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Crown Princess Mary Canc Ctr Westmead, Radiat Oncol, Dept Med Phys, Westmead, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 14期
关键词
spencer attix restricted stopping power ratio; beam quality specifier; flattening filter free; STOPPING-POWER RATIOS; HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON; SPECTRAL RECONSTRUCTION; SPECIFICATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/N271
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Removal of the flattening filter alters the energy spectrum of the photon beam such that current beam quality specifiers may not correctly account for this change when predicting the Spencer-Attix restricted water-to-air mass collision stopping-power ratio, ((L) over bar/rho)(air)(water). Johnsson et al (2000 Phys. Med. Biol. 45 2733-45) proposed a beam quality specifier, known as the dual parameter beam quality specifier, which was calculated via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using transmission data of primary kerma through two differing thicknesses of water material. Ceberg et al (2010 Med. Phys. 37 1164-8) extended this MC study to include relevant flattening filter free (FFF) beam data. Experimental investigations of this dual parameter beam quality specifier have not previously been published, therefore the purpose of this work was to validate that the dual parameter beam quality specifier could be measured experimentally for clinical beams (both with a flattening filter (WFF) and without (FFF)). Transmission measurements of primary kerma were performed by employing the setup outlined in Johnsson et al (1999 Phys. Med. Biol. 44 2445-50). Varying absorber thicknesses, in 5 cm increments from 5 to 40 cm, were placed at isocentre with the chamber positioned at an extended source to chamber distance of 300 cm. Experimental setup for TPR20,10 and %dd(10)(x) followed the methodology outlined in IAEA TRS398 (2004) and TG-51 (1999) with AAPM Addendum to TG-51 (2014) respectively. The maximum difference of ((L) over bar/rho)(air)(water) determined using the different beam quality specifiers was found to be 0.35%. Analysis of the absorber thickness combination found that small thicknesses (< 10 cm) for the first absorber and absorbers similar in thickness (< 10 cm) should be avoided. Stopping-power ratios of the beams investigated were determined using three different beam quality specifiers. The results demonstrated successful experimental determination of the dual parameter beam quality specifier, indicating its potential as an alternate beam quality specifier for FFF beams.
引用
收藏
页码:N271 / N281
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ion-recombination correction for different ionization chambers in high dose rate flattening-filter-free photon beams
    Lang, Stephanie
    Hrbacek, Jan
    Leong, Aidan
    Kloeck, Stephan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (09):
  • [42] Dosimetric parameters calculation for 18 MV photon beam in flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter free (FFF) linear accelerators with and without magnetic deflector and lead filter
    Hashemizadeh, Morteza
    Zabihzadeh, Mansour
    Shahbazian, Hojatollah
    Fatahi-Asl, Jafar
    Reshadatian, Marziyeh
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [43] Surface Dose Evaluation of the Equivalent Quality Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Meshram, M.
    Pramanik, S.
    Ranjith, C. P.
    Meshram, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3502 - 3502
  • [44] Depth Dose Enhancement on Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beam: A Monte Carlo Study in Nanoparticle-Enhanced Radiotherapy
    Chow, James C. L.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (20): : 1 - 10
  • [45] Evaluating Mobius3D Dose Calculation Accuracy for Small-Field Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Kim, Changhwan
    Kim, Jihun
    Lee, Young Kyu
    Shin, Han-Back
    Han, Min Cheol
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, Jin Sung
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2022, 21
  • [46] Use and Choice of Ionization Chambers for the Commissioning of Flattened and Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beams: Determination of Recombination Correction Factor (ks)
    Stucchi, C.
    Bresolin, A.
    Mongioj, V.
    Carrara, M.
    Pignoli, E.
    Bonfantini, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 371 - 371
  • [47] Small-field Dosimetry of 6-and 10-MV Flattening Filter-free and Flattening Filter Photon Beams for Therapeutic Use
    Shukla, Jooli
    Dwivedi, Shekhar
    Kansal, Sandeep
    Dangwal, Vinod Kumar
    Tiwari, K. P.
    Singla, Amit Kumar
    Rani, Supriya
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PURE & APPLIED PHYSICS, 2023, 61 (10) : 846 - 850
  • [48] Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors
    Dwivedi, Shekhar
    Kansal, Sandeep
    Dangwal, Vinod Kumar
    Bharati, Avinav
    Shukla, Jooli
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2021, 7 (04):
  • [49] 3D In-Vivo Portal Dosimetry Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy with Flattening-Filter-Free Beams: First Results
    Taborda, A.
    Stroom, J.
    Nijsten, S.
    Greco, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E181 - E181
  • [50] Characterisation of flattening filter free (FFF) beam properties for initial beam set-up and routine QA, independent of flattened beams
    Paynter, D.
    Weston, S. J.
    Cosgrove, V. P.
    Thwaites, D. I.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01):