Experimental validation of the dual parameter beam quality specifier for reference dosimetry in flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams

被引:3
|
作者
Simpson, Emma [1 ]
Gajewski, Romuald [1 ]
Flower, Emily [1 ]
Stensmyr, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Crown Princess Mary Canc Ctr Westmead, Radiat Oncol, Dept Med Phys, Westmead, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 14期
关键词
spencer attix restricted stopping power ratio; beam quality specifier; flattening filter free; STOPPING-POWER RATIOS; HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON; SPECTRAL RECONSTRUCTION; SPECIFICATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/N271
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Removal of the flattening filter alters the energy spectrum of the photon beam such that current beam quality specifiers may not correctly account for this change when predicting the Spencer-Attix restricted water-to-air mass collision stopping-power ratio, ((L) over bar/rho)(air)(water). Johnsson et al (2000 Phys. Med. Biol. 45 2733-45) proposed a beam quality specifier, known as the dual parameter beam quality specifier, which was calculated via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using transmission data of primary kerma through two differing thicknesses of water material. Ceberg et al (2010 Med. Phys. 37 1164-8) extended this MC study to include relevant flattening filter free (FFF) beam data. Experimental investigations of this dual parameter beam quality specifier have not previously been published, therefore the purpose of this work was to validate that the dual parameter beam quality specifier could be measured experimentally for clinical beams (both with a flattening filter (WFF) and without (FFF)). Transmission measurements of primary kerma were performed by employing the setup outlined in Johnsson et al (1999 Phys. Med. Biol. 44 2445-50). Varying absorber thicknesses, in 5 cm increments from 5 to 40 cm, were placed at isocentre with the chamber positioned at an extended source to chamber distance of 300 cm. Experimental setup for TPR20,10 and %dd(10)(x) followed the methodology outlined in IAEA TRS398 (2004) and TG-51 (1999) with AAPM Addendum to TG-51 (2014) respectively. The maximum difference of ((L) over bar/rho)(air)(water) determined using the different beam quality specifiers was found to be 0.35%. Analysis of the absorber thickness combination found that small thicknesses (< 10 cm) for the first absorber and absorbers similar in thickness (< 10 cm) should be avoided. Stopping-power ratios of the beams investigated were determined using three different beam quality specifiers. The results demonstrated successful experimental determination of the dual parameter beam quality specifier, indicating its potential as an alternate beam quality specifier for FFF beams.
引用
收藏
页码:N271 / N281
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a water equivalent EPID model for flattening filter free (FFF) beam transit dosimetry
    Deshpande, S.
    Blake, S.
    Holloway, L.
    Vial, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S961 - S962
  • [22] Beam quality and dose perturbation of 6 MV flattening-filter-free linac
    Tsiamas, P.
    Sajo, E.
    Cifter, F.
    Theodorou, K.
    Kappas, C.
    Makrigiorgos, M.
    Marcus, K.
    Zygmanski, P.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 30 (01): : 47 - 56
  • [23] On the determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free photon beams in radiation therapy
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Belosi, Maria Francesca
    Cozzi, Luca
    Nicolini, Giorgia
    Vanetti, Eugenio
    Bolard, Gregory
    Fenoglietto, Pascal
    Krauss, Harald
    Fogliata, Antonella
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02)
  • [24] Comparison of Aperture Complexity Between VMAT Plans Using Conventionally Flattened (FF) and Flattening-Filter-Free (FFF) Beams
    Liu, Q.
    Liang, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E422 - E423
  • [25] Quantification of the role of lead foil in flattening filter free beam reference dosimetry
    Gao, Song
    Nelson, Christopher
    Wang, Congjun
    Kathriarachchi, Vindu
    Choi, Michael
    Saxena, Rishik
    Kendall, Robin
    Balter, Peter
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (04):
  • [26] Dose Enhancement for the Flattening-Filter-Free and Flattening-Filter Photon Beams in Nanoparticle-Enhanced Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Phantom Study
    Martelli, Stefano
    Chow, James C. L.
    NANOMATERIALS, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [27] An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams
    Chung, Heeteak
    Prado, Karl L.
    Yi, Byong Yong
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (04): : 951 - 960
  • [28] Determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free beams
    Vanetti, E.
    Clivio, A.
    Belosi, M. F.
    Cozzi, L.
    Nicolini, G.
    Bolard, G.
    Fenoglietto, P.
    Krauss, H.
    Fogliata, A.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2015, 191 (01) : 102 - 103
  • [29] Determination of reference levels for quality assurance of flattening filter free beams
    Vanetti, E.
    Clivio, A.
    Belosi, M. F.
    Cozzi, L.
    Nicolini, G.
    Bolard, G.
    Fenoglietto, P.
    Krauss, H.
    Fogliata, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S160 - S160
  • [30] Evaluation of the TrueBeam machine performance check (MPC) beam constancy checks for flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams
    Barnes, Michael P.
    Greer, Peter B.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (01): : 139 - 150