Experimental validation of the dual parameter beam quality specifier for reference dosimetry in flattening-filter-free (FFF) photon beams

被引:3
|
作者
Simpson, Emma [1 ]
Gajewski, Romuald [1 ]
Flower, Emily [1 ]
Stensmyr, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Crown Princess Mary Canc Ctr Westmead, Radiat Oncol, Dept Med Phys, Westmead, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2015年 / 60卷 / 14期
关键词
spencer attix restricted stopping power ratio; beam quality specifier; flattening filter free; STOPPING-POWER RATIOS; HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON; SPECTRAL RECONSTRUCTION; SPECIFICATION;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/N271
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Removal of the flattening filter alters the energy spectrum of the photon beam such that current beam quality specifiers may not correctly account for this change when predicting the Spencer-Attix restricted water-to-air mass collision stopping-power ratio, ((L) over bar/rho)(air)(water). Johnsson et al (2000 Phys. Med. Biol. 45 2733-45) proposed a beam quality specifier, known as the dual parameter beam quality specifier, which was calculated via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using transmission data of primary kerma through two differing thicknesses of water material. Ceberg et al (2010 Med. Phys. 37 1164-8) extended this MC study to include relevant flattening filter free (FFF) beam data. Experimental investigations of this dual parameter beam quality specifier have not previously been published, therefore the purpose of this work was to validate that the dual parameter beam quality specifier could be measured experimentally for clinical beams (both with a flattening filter (WFF) and without (FFF)). Transmission measurements of primary kerma were performed by employing the setup outlined in Johnsson et al (1999 Phys. Med. Biol. 44 2445-50). Varying absorber thicknesses, in 5 cm increments from 5 to 40 cm, were placed at isocentre with the chamber positioned at an extended source to chamber distance of 300 cm. Experimental setup for TPR20,10 and %dd(10)(x) followed the methodology outlined in IAEA TRS398 (2004) and TG-51 (1999) with AAPM Addendum to TG-51 (2014) respectively. The maximum difference of ((L) over bar/rho)(air)(water) determined using the different beam quality specifiers was found to be 0.35%. Analysis of the absorber thickness combination found that small thicknesses (< 10 cm) for the first absorber and absorbers similar in thickness (< 10 cm) should be avoided. Stopping-power ratios of the beams investigated were determined using three different beam quality specifiers. The results demonstrated successful experimental determination of the dual parameter beam quality specifier, indicating its potential as an alternate beam quality specifier for FFF beams.
引用
收藏
页码:N271 / N281
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Definition of parameters for quality assurance of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams in radiation therapy
    Fogliata, A.
    Garcia, R.
    Knoos, T.
    Nicolini, G.
    Clivio, A.
    Vanetti, E.
    Khamphan, C.
    Cozzi, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) : 6455 - 6464
  • [12] Plan Optimization for IMRT with Flattening-filter-free (FFF) Beams by using Compressed Sensing Technique
    Kim, T.
    Wang, L.
    Mok, E.
    Suh, T.
    Xing, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S721 - S721
  • [13] Small field dosimetry for flattening filter free photon beams
    Mateus, D.
    Beyer, G.
    Vieira, S.
    Greco, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S425 - S426
  • [14] Dosimetric Evaluation of Flattening Filter-free (FFF) Photon Beams for Lung SBRT
    Chen, Q.
    Cai, J.
    Wu, Q.
    Yin, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S609 - S609
  • [15] The impact of flattening filter free (FFF) photon beams to ion recombination correction factor
    Hentihu, F. K.
    Ryangga, D.
    Pawiro, S. A.
    18TH ASIA-OCEANIA CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS (AOCMP) & 16TH SOUTH-EAST ASIA CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS (SEACOMP), 2019, 1248
  • [16] Effect of ArcCHECK Array Calibration On Patient Specific Quality Assurance in Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Photon Beams
    Srivastava, S.
    Pinnaduwage, D.
    Jani, S.
    Yan, X.
    Metuge, P.
    Patel, S.
    Thawani, N.
    Mutyala, S.
    Das, I.
    Sorensen, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E327 - E328
  • [17] Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Quality Correction Factor Determination Using Experimental and Monte Carlo Methods
    Wood, M.
    Desai, V.
    Simiele, E.
    Taneja, S.
    DeWerd, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 469 - 469
  • [18] Photon Spectrum Modeling of Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Beam and the Optimization of Model Parameters
    Cho, W.
    Kielar, K.
    Xing, L.
    Suh, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3822 - 3822
  • [19] Is Lead Foil Necessary for Flattening Filter Free Beam Reference Dosimetry?
    Gao, S.
    Nelson, C.
    Kathriarachchi, V.
    Choi, M.
    Saxena, R.
    Kendall, R.
    Balter, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E300 - E300
  • [20] Comparison of kQ factors measured with a water calorimeter in flattening filter free (FFF) and conventional flattening filter (cFF) photon beams
    de Prez, Leon
    de Pooter, Jacco
    Jansen, Bartel
    Perik, Thijs
    Wittkamper, Frits
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (04):