Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation

被引:144
|
作者
Zdero, Rad [1 ]
Walker, Richard
Waddell, James P.
Schemitsch, Emil H.
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Martin Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Toronto, ON L5G 456, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.01561
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A variety of methods are available for the fixation of femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. However, few studies in the literature have quantified the performance of such repair constructs. The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically four different constructs for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending, and torsion to determine initial stiffness, as well as stiffness following fixation of a simulated femoral midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Four fracture fixation constructs (five specimens per group) were assessed: construct A was a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with locked screws; construct B, a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with cables and locked screws; construct C, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with cables and nonlocked screws; and construct D, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with allograft strut, cables, and nonlocked screws. Axial stiffness, lateral bending stiffness, and torsional stiffness were assessed with respect to baseline intact specimen values. Axial load to failure was also measured for the specimens. Results: Construct D demonstrated either equivalent or superior stiffness in all testing modes compared with the other constructs in femora with both a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. A comparison of constructs A, B, and C demonstrated equivalent stiffness in all test modes (with one exception) in femora with a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. Conclusions: A combination of a nonlocking plate with an allograft strut (construct D) resulted in the highest stiffness of the constructs examined for treating a periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral component of a total hip replacement. Clinical Relevance: A locked plate (constructs A and B) should be used with caution as a stand-alone treatment for the fixation of a periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture following total hip arthroplasty, particularly with good bone stock.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1077
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE IN OSTEOPOROTIC PATIENT
    Pardina Lanuza, N.
    Angulo Tabernero, M.
    Tejedor Carreno, C.
    Gonzalez Buesa, E.
    Puyuelo Jarne, I.
    Laga Cuen, C.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 29 : S150 - S151
  • [42] Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture
    Franklin, John
    Malchau, Henrik
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2007, 38 (06): : 655 - 660
  • [43] Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture - an Interdisciplinary Challenge
    Hagel, Alexander
    Siekmann, Holger
    Delank, Karl-Stefan
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 111 (39): : 658 - 664
  • [44] Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems - A biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates
    Fulkerson, E
    Koval, K
    Preston, CF
    Iesaka, K
    Kummer, FJ
    Egol, KA
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2006, 20 (02) : 89 - 93
  • [45] Distal fibula fracture fixation: Biomechanical evaluation of three different fixation implants
    Knutsen, Ashleen R.
    Sangiorgio, Sophia N.
    Liu, Chang
    Zhou, Steve
    Warganich, Tibor
    Fleming, John
    Harris, Thomas G.
    Ebramzadeh, Edward
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (04) : 278 - 285
  • [46] Periprosthetic fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone
    Lenz, Mark
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    Waehnert, Dirk
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 : S44 - S50
  • [47] BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF FRACTURE HEALING AFTER RIGID PLATE FIXATION
    PAAVOLAINEN, P
    SLATIS, P
    HOLMSTROM, T
    AALTO, K
    AHONEN, J
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 48 (02): : 226 - 227
  • [48] A CLINICAL AND COMPARATIVE BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL OSTEOTOMY FIXATION IN CHILDREN
    GREIS, PE
    WARD, WT
    RODOSKY, M
    RUDERT, MJ
    STANITSKI, C
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1993, 16 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [49] Biomechanical rationale and evaluation of an implant system for rib fracture fixation
    Bottlang, M.
    Walleser, S.
    Noll, M.
    Honold, S.
    Madey, S. M.
    Fitzpatrick, D.
    Long, W. B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2010, 36 (05) : 417 - 426
  • [50] Biomechanical rationale and evaluation of an implant system for rib fracture fixation
    M. Bottlang
    S. Walleser
    M. Noll
    S. Honold
    S. M. Madey
    D. Fitzpatrick
    W. B. Long
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2010, 36 : 417 - 426