Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation

被引:144
|
作者
Zdero, Rad [1 ]
Walker, Richard
Waddell, James P.
Schemitsch, Emil H.
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Martin Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Toronto, ON L5G 456, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.01561
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A variety of methods are available for the fixation of femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. However, few studies in the literature have quantified the performance of such repair constructs. The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically four different constructs for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending, and torsion to determine initial stiffness, as well as stiffness following fixation of a simulated femoral midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Four fracture fixation constructs (five specimens per group) were assessed: construct A was a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with locked screws; construct B, a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with cables and locked screws; construct C, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with cables and nonlocked screws; and construct D, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with allograft strut, cables, and nonlocked screws. Axial stiffness, lateral bending stiffness, and torsional stiffness were assessed with respect to baseline intact specimen values. Axial load to failure was also measured for the specimens. Results: Construct D demonstrated either equivalent or superior stiffness in all testing modes compared with the other constructs in femora with both a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. A comparison of constructs A, B, and C demonstrated equivalent stiffness in all test modes (with one exception) in femora with a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. Conclusions: A combination of a nonlocking plate with an allograft strut (construct D) resulted in the highest stiffness of the constructs examined for treating a periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral component of a total hip replacement. Clinical Relevance: A locked plate (constructs A and B) should be used with caution as a stand-alone treatment for the fixation of a periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture following total hip arthroplasty, particularly with good bone stock.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1077
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A regression orthogonal biomechanical analysis of internal fixation for femoral shaft fracture
    Fang, Runxin
    Ji, Aimin
    Zhao, Zhonghang
    Long, Dengyan
    Chen, Changsheng
    BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 40 (03) : 1277 - 1290
  • [22] The Biomechanical Analysis for DHS and Wire fixation Osteoporotic and Unstable Femoral Fracture
    Wu, H. F.
    Lai, K. A.
    Huang, M. T.
    Chen, H. S.
    Chung, K. C.
    Yang, F. S.
    2011 IEEE 37TH ANNUAL NORTHEAST BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE (NEBEC), 2011,
  • [23] Femoral periprosthetic fracture treatment using the Ortho-Bridge System: a biomechanical study
    Yuntao Long
    Yubin Qi
    Guilai Zuo
    Qingjie Zhang
    Zhenlin Liu
    Wen Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [24] Femoral periprosthetic fracture treatment using the Ortho-Bridge System: a biomechanical study
    Long, Yuntao
    Qi, Yubin
    Zuo, Guilai
    Zhang, Qingjie
    Liu, Zhenlin
    Wang, Wen
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [25] Biomechanical Evaluation of the Modified Cannulated Screws Fixation of Unstable Femoral Neck Fracture with Comminuted Posteromedial Cortex
    Liu, Jingwen
    Zhang, Baokun
    Yin, Bohao
    Chen, Hongchi
    Sun, Hui
    Zhang, Wei
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [26] Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation
    Waehnert, Dirk
    Schroeder, Richard
    Schulze, Martin
    Westerhoff, Peter
    Raschke, Michael
    Stange, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [27] Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: A review of biomechanical testing
    Moazen, Mehran
    Jones, Alison C.
    Jin, Zhongmin
    Wilcox, Ruth K.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2011, 26 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [28] Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison of four methods of fixation
    Tatu J. Mäkinen
    Herman S. Dhotar
    Simcha G. Fichman
    Matthew J. Gunton
    Mitchell Woodside
    Oleg Safir
    David Backstein
    Thomas L. Willett
    Paul R. T. Kuzyk
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1737 - 1742
  • [29] Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation
    Dirk Wähnert
    Richard Schröder
    Martin Schulze
    Peter Westerhoff
    Michael Raschke
    Richard Stange
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 47 - 53
  • [30] Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem - A biomechanical study of 5 techniques
    Dennis, MG
    Simon, JA
    Kummer, FJ
    Koval, KJ
    DiCesare, PE
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2000, 15 (04): : 523 - 528