Biomechanical evaluation of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation

被引:144
|
作者
Zdero, Rad [1 ]
Walker, Richard
Waddell, James P.
Schemitsch, Emil H.
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Martin Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Toronto, ON L5G 456, Canada
来源
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.F.01561
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A variety of methods are available for the fixation of femoral shaft fractures after total hip arthroplasty. However, few studies in the literature have quantified the performance of such repair constructs. The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically four different constructs for the fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures following total hip arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty synthetic femora were tested in axial compression, lateral bending, and torsion to determine initial stiffness, as well as stiffness following fixation of a simulated femoral midshaft fracture with and without a bone gap. Four fracture fixation constructs (five specimens per group) were assessed: construct A was a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with locked screws; construct B, a Synthes locked plate (a twelve-hole broad dynamic compression plate) with cables and locked screws; construct C, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with cables and nonlocked screws; and construct D, a Zimmer nonlocking (eight-hole) cable plate with allograft strut, cables, and nonlocked screws. Axial stiffness, lateral bending stiffness, and torsional stiffness were assessed with respect to baseline intact specimen values. Axial load to failure was also measured for the specimens. Results: Construct D demonstrated either equivalent or superior stiffness in all testing modes compared with the other constructs in femora with both a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. A comparison of constructs A, B, and C demonstrated equivalent stiffness in all test modes (with one exception) in femora with a midshaft fracture and a bone gap. Conclusions: A combination of a nonlocking plate with an allograft strut (construct D) resulted in the highest stiffness of the constructs examined for treating a periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral component of a total hip replacement. Clinical Relevance: A locked plate (constructs A and B) should be used with caution as a stand-alone treatment for the fixation of a periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture following total hip arthroplasty, particularly with good bone stock.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1077
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Biomechanical Comparison of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation in Normal and Osteoporotic Cadaveric Bone
    Demos, Harry A.
    Briones, Marcus S.
    White, Peter H.
    Hogan, Kathleen A.
    Barfield, William R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (05): : 783 - 788
  • [2] Comparison of fixation techniques in Vancouver type AG periprosthetic femoral fracture: a biomechanical study
    Sariyilmaz, Kerim
    Korkmaz, Murat
    Ozkunt, Okan
    Gemalmaz, Hall Can
    Sunguill, Mustafa
    Baydogan, Murat
    Kaya, Ibrahim
    Okla, Fatih
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2016, 50 (03) : 373 - 378
  • [3] Application of Far Cortical Locking Technology in Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation: A Biomechanical Study
    Moazen, Mehran
    Leonidou, Andreas
    Pagkalos, Joseph
    Marghoub, Arsalan
    Fagan, Michael J.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2016, 31 (08): : 1849 - 1856
  • [4] Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables
    Graham, Simon M.
    Mak, Jonathan H.
    Moazen, Mehran
    Leonidou, Andreas
    Jones, Alison C.
    Wilcox, Ruth K.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (05) : 875 - 880
  • [5] The biomechanical effect of bone quality and fracture topography on locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Leonidou, Andreas
    Moazen, Mehran
    Lepetsos, Panagiotis
    Graham, Simon M.
    Macheras, George A.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (02): : 213 - 217
  • [6] Biomechanical Evaluation for Mechanisms of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
    Rupprecht, Martin
    Sellenschloh, Kai
    Grossterlinden, Lars
    Pueschel, Klaus
    Morlock, Michael
    Amling, Michael
    Rueger, Johannes M.
    Lehmann, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 70 (04): : E62 - E66
  • [7] Biomechanical Evaluation of Dual Plate Configurations for Femoral Shaft Fracture Fixation
    El Beaino, Marc
    Morris, Randal P.
    Lindsey, Ronald W.
    Gugala, Zbigniew
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [8] Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fracture: A Biomechanical Analysis of Cerclage Fixation
    Frisch, Nicholas B.
    Charters, Michael A.
    Sikora-Klak, Jakub
    Banglmaier, Richard F.
    Oravec, Daniel J.
    Silverton, Craig D.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (08): : 1449 - 1457
  • [9] Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures: A biomechanical comparison of two techniques
    Dennis, MG
    Simon, JA
    Kummer, FJ
    Koval, KJ
    Di Cesare, PE
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2001, 15 (03) : 177 - 180
  • [10] The biomechanical analysis of three plating fixation systems for periprosthetic femoral fracture near the tip of a total hip arthroplasty
    James P. Lever
    Rad Zdero
    Markku T. Nousiainen
    James P. Waddell
    Emil H. Schemitsch
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 5