Machine learning and statistical prediction of fastball velocity with biomechanical predictors

被引:11
|
作者
Nicholson, K. F. [1 ,5 ]
Collins, G. S. [2 ,3 ]
Waterman, B. R. [1 ]
Bullock, G. S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Ctr Sport, Exercise & Osteoarthritis Res Versus Arthrit, Oxford, England
[5] 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27103 USA
关键词
Calibration; Root mean square error; Kinetic Chain; Baseball; Performance; Pitching; BASEBALL PITCHERS; PITCHING BIOMECHANICS; TRUNK ROTATION; SAMPLE-SIZE; SHOULDER; PERFORMANCE; MECHANICS; INJURY; MODELS; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.110999
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In recent years, one of the most important factors for success among baseball pitchers is fastball velocity. The purpose of this study was to (1) to develop statistical and machine learning models of fastball velocity, (2) to identify the strongest predictors of fastball velocity, and (3) to compare the models' prediction performances. Three dimensional biomechanical analyses were performed on high school (n = 165) and college (n = 62) baseball pitchers. A total of 16 kinetic and kinematic predictors from the entire pitching sequence were included in regression and machine learning models. All models were internally validated through ten-fold cross -validation. Model performance was evaluated through root mean square error (RMSE) and calibration with 95% confidence intervals. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated the best prediction performance [RMSE: 0.34; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999, 1.001)], while regression demonstrated the greatest prediction error [RMSE: 2.49; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.15)]. Maximum elbow extension velocity (relative influence: 19.3%), maximum humeral rotation velocity (9.6%), maximum lead leg ground reaction force resultant (9.1%), trunk forward flexion at release (7.9%), time difference of maximum pelvis rotation velocity and maximum trunk rotation velocity (7.8%) demonstrated the greatest influence on pitch velocity. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated better calibration and reduced RMSE compared to regression. The influence of lead leg ground reaction force resultant and trunk and arm kinematics on pitch velocity demonstrates the interdependent relationship of the entire kinetic chain during the pitching motion. Coaches, players, and performance professionals should focus on the identified metrics when designing pitch velocity improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Statistical and Machine Learning Approach in Forex Prediction Based on Empirical Data
    Sidehabi, Sitti Wetenriajeng
    Indrabayu
    Tandungan, Sofyan
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND CYBERNETICS, 2016, : 63 - 68
  • [42] A comprehensive evaluation of statistical, machine learning and deep learning models for time series prediction
    Xuan, Ang
    Yin, Mengmeng
    Li, Yupei
    Chen, Xiyu
    Ma, Zhenliang
    2022 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS (CDMA 2022), 2022, : 55 - 60
  • [43] Hyperparameter Tuning on Classical Machine Learning Models in Orthopedic Disease Prediction on Biomechanical Features
    Hai Thanh Nguyen
    Hong Minh Nguyen
    Nhu Bich Thi Pham
    Tai Tan Phan
    Linh Thuy Thi Pham
    COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS, CISIS-2024, 2024, 87 : 48 - 59
  • [44] Machine Learning Based Statistical Prediction Model for Improving Performance of Live Virtual Machine Migration
    Patel, Minal
    Chaudhary, Sanjay
    Garg, Sanjay
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [45] Machine Learning Models for Glycemic Response Prediction: Uncovering Novel Metabolic Predictors
    Stinson, Emma
    Piaggi, Paolo
    Arreola, Elsa Vazquez
    Chang, Douglas
    Krakoff, Jonathan
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 : 31 - 31
  • [46] Metaheuristics Method for Classification and Prediction of Student Performance Using Machine Learning Predictors
    Kamal, Mustafa
    Chakrabarti, Sudakshina
    Ramirez-Asis, Edwin
    Asis-Lopez, Maximiliano
    Allauca-Castillo, Wendy
    Kumar, Tribhuwan
    Sanchez, Domenic T.
    Rahmani, Abdul Wahab
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [47] A STATISTICAL MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH TO PREDICT RESIDENTIAL HVAC USAGE WITH LAGGED ENVIRONMENTAL PREDICTORS
    Baath, Jashanjeet
    Little, Madelyn
    Bhattacharya, Anirban
    Bandyopadhyay, Arkasama
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2023, VOL 7, 2023,
  • [48] Machine learning-based prediction for settling velocity of microplastics with various shapes
    Qian, Shangtuo
    Qiao, Xuyang
    Zhang, Wenming
    Yu, Zijian
    Dong, Shunan
    Feng, Jiangang
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 249
  • [49] Machine learning technique for the prediction of shear wave velocity using petrophysical logs
    Anemangely, Mohammad
    Ramezanzadeh, Ahmad
    Amiri, Hamed
    Hoseinpour, Seyed-Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 174 : 306 - 327
  • [50] Statistical Machine-Learning Methods for Genomic Prediction Using the SKM Library
    Montesinos Lopez, Osval A.
    Mosqueda Gonzalez, Brandon Alejandro
    Montesinos Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    GENES, 2023, 14 (05)