Machine learning and statistical prediction of fastball velocity with biomechanical predictors

被引:11
|
作者
Nicholson, K. F. [1 ,5 ]
Collins, G. S. [2 ,3 ]
Waterman, B. R. [1 ]
Bullock, G. S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Ctr Sport, Exercise & Osteoarthritis Res Versus Arthrit, Oxford, England
[5] 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27103 USA
关键词
Calibration; Root mean square error; Kinetic Chain; Baseball; Performance; Pitching; BASEBALL PITCHERS; PITCHING BIOMECHANICS; TRUNK ROTATION; SAMPLE-SIZE; SHOULDER; PERFORMANCE; MECHANICS; INJURY; MODELS; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.110999
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In recent years, one of the most important factors for success among baseball pitchers is fastball velocity. The purpose of this study was to (1) to develop statistical and machine learning models of fastball velocity, (2) to identify the strongest predictors of fastball velocity, and (3) to compare the models' prediction performances. Three dimensional biomechanical analyses were performed on high school (n = 165) and college (n = 62) baseball pitchers. A total of 16 kinetic and kinematic predictors from the entire pitching sequence were included in regression and machine learning models. All models were internally validated through ten-fold cross -validation. Model performance was evaluated through root mean square error (RMSE) and calibration with 95% confidence intervals. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated the best prediction performance [RMSE: 0.34; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999, 1.001)], while regression demonstrated the greatest prediction error [RMSE: 2.49; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.15)]. Maximum elbow extension velocity (relative influence: 19.3%), maximum humeral rotation velocity (9.6%), maximum lead leg ground reaction force resultant (9.1%), trunk forward flexion at release (7.9%), time difference of maximum pelvis rotation velocity and maximum trunk rotation velocity (7.8%) demonstrated the greatest influence on pitch velocity. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated better calibration and reduced RMSE compared to regression. The influence of lead leg ground reaction force resultant and trunk and arm kinematics on pitch velocity demonstrates the interdependent relationship of the entire kinetic chain during the pitching motion. Coaches, players, and performance professionals should focus on the identified metrics when designing pitch velocity improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Popularity prediction of movies: from statistical modeling to machine learning techniques
    Abidi, Syed Muhammad Raza
    Xu, Yonglin
    Ni, Jianyue
    Wang, Xiangmeng
    Zhang, Wu
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 79 (47-48) : 35583 - 35617
  • [32] Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling
    Goetz, J. N.
    Brenning, A.
    Petschko, H.
    Leopold, P.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 81 : 1 - 11
  • [33] Prediction of side chain Orientations in proteins by statistical machine learning methods
    Yan, Aimin
    Kloczkowski, Andrzej
    Hofmann, Heike
    Jernigan, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS, 2007, 25 (03): : 275 - 287
  • [34] Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Automotive Spare Parts Demand Prediction
    Carmo, Tiago
    Cruz, Manuel
    Santos, Jorge
    Ramos, Sandra
    Barroso, Sofia
    Araujo, Patricia
    PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AT ECMI, 2022, 39 : 471 - 476
  • [35] Wheat Yield Prediction for Turkey Using Statistical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods
    Ozden, Cevher
    Karadogan, Nurguel
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 61 (02): : 429 - 435
  • [36] Analysis and prediction of TetR allostery with machine learning methods and a statistical model
    Liu, Zhuang
    Leander, Megan
    Raman, Srivatsan
    Cui, Qiang
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 121 (03) : 286A - 287A
  • [37] STATISTICAL PREDICTION OF EMOTIONAL STATES BY PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS WITH MANOVA AND MACHINE LEARNING
    Chueh, Tung-Hung
    Chen, Tai-Been
    Lu, Henry Horng-Shing
    Ju, Shan-Shan
    Tao, Teh-Ho
    Shaw, Jiunn-Haur
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2012, 26 (04)
  • [38] Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction
    Iranitalab, Amirfarrokh
    Khattak, Aemal
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 108 : 27 - 36
  • [39] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING AND STATISTICAL METHODS IN SOLAR ENERGY PREDICTION
    Pu Z.
    Xia P.
    Zhang L.
    Wang S.
    Wang Y.
    Min M.
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44 (07): : 162 - 167
  • [40] Marine Data Prediction: An Evaluation of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Statistical Predictive Models
    Ali, Ahmed
    Fathalla, Ahmed
    Salah, Ahmad
    Bekhit, Mahmoud
    Eldesouky, Esraa
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 2021 (2021)