Machine learning and statistical prediction of fastball velocity with biomechanical predictors

被引:11
|
作者
Nicholson, K. F. [1 ,5 ]
Collins, G. S. [2 ,3 ]
Waterman, B. R. [1 ]
Bullock, G. S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Ctr Sport, Exercise & Osteoarthritis Res Versus Arthrit, Oxford, England
[5] 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27103 USA
关键词
Calibration; Root mean square error; Kinetic Chain; Baseball; Performance; Pitching; BASEBALL PITCHERS; PITCHING BIOMECHANICS; TRUNK ROTATION; SAMPLE-SIZE; SHOULDER; PERFORMANCE; MECHANICS; INJURY; MODELS; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.110999
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In recent years, one of the most important factors for success among baseball pitchers is fastball velocity. The purpose of this study was to (1) to develop statistical and machine learning models of fastball velocity, (2) to identify the strongest predictors of fastball velocity, and (3) to compare the models' prediction performances. Three dimensional biomechanical analyses were performed on high school (n = 165) and college (n = 62) baseball pitchers. A total of 16 kinetic and kinematic predictors from the entire pitching sequence were included in regression and machine learning models. All models were internally validated through ten-fold cross -validation. Model performance was evaluated through root mean square error (RMSE) and calibration with 95% confidence intervals. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated the best prediction performance [RMSE: 0.34; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999, 1.001)], while regression demonstrated the greatest prediction error [RMSE: 2.49; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.15)]. Maximum elbow extension velocity (relative influence: 19.3%), maximum humeral rotation velocity (9.6%), maximum lead leg ground reaction force resultant (9.1%), trunk forward flexion at release (7.9%), time difference of maximum pelvis rotation velocity and maximum trunk rotation velocity (7.8%) demonstrated the greatest influence on pitch velocity. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated better calibration and reduced RMSE compared to regression. The influence of lead leg ground reaction force resultant and trunk and arm kinematics on pitch velocity demonstrates the interdependent relationship of the entire kinetic chain during the pitching motion. Coaches, players, and performance professionals should focus on the identified metrics when designing pitch velocity improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine Learning for Slope Failure Prediction Based on Inverse Velocity and Dimensionless Inverse Velocity
    Malekian, Maral
    Momayez, Moe
    Bellett, Pat
    Carrea, Fernanda
    Tennakoon, Eranda
    MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION, 2023, 40 (05) : 1557 - 1566
  • [22] Machine learning approach for hemorrhagic transformation prediction: Capturing predictors' interaction
    Elsaid, Ahmed F.
    Fahmi, Rasha M.
    Shehta, Nahed
    Ramadan, Bothina M.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [23] Prediction of seismic P-wave velocity using machine learning
    Dumke, Ines
    Berndt, Christian
    SOLID EARTH, 2019, 10 (06) : 1989 - 2000
  • [24] Velocity Prediction for Multi-rotor UAVs Based on Machine Learning
    Wang, Rongzhi
    Zou, Danping
    Pei, Ling
    Liu, Peilin
    Xu, Changqing
    CHINA SATELLITE NAVIGATION CONFERENCE (CSNC) 2016 PROCEEDINGS, VOL II, 2016, 389 : 487 - 500
  • [25] A Machine Learning Approach for the Mean Flow Velocity Prediction in Alluvial Channels
    Kitsikoudis, Vasileios
    Sidiropoulos, Epaminondas
    Iliadis, Lazaros
    Hrissanthou, Vlassios
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 29 (12) : 4379 - 4395
  • [26] A Machine Learning Approach for the Mean Flow Velocity Prediction in Alluvial Channels
    Vasileios Kitsikoudis
    Epaminondas Sidiropoulos
    Lazaros Iliadis
    Vlassios Hrissanthou
    Water Resources Management, 2015, 29 : 4379 - 4395
  • [27] Prediction of Settling Velocity of Microplastics by Multiple Machine-Learning Methods
    Leng, Zequan
    Cao, Lu
    Gao, Yun
    Hou, Yadong
    Wu, Di
    Huo, Zhongyan
    Zhao, Xizeng
    WATER, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [28] Application of Machine Learning Model for the Prediction of Settling Velocity of Fine Sediments
    Loh, Wing Son
    Chin, Ren Jie
    Ling, Lloyd
    Lai, Sai Hin
    Soo, Eugene Zhen Xiang
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (23)
  • [29] Popularity prediction of movies: from statistical modeling to machine learning techniques
    Syed Muhammad Raza Abidi
    Yonglin Xu
    Jianyue Ni
    Xiangmeng Wang
    Wu Zhang
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2020, 79 : 35583 - 35617
  • [30] Price Prediction of Seasonal Items Using Machine Learning and Statistical Methods
    Mohamed, Mohamed Ali
    El-Henawy, Ibrahim Mahmoud
    Salah, Ahmad
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 70 (02): : 3473 - 3489