Machine learning and statistical prediction of fastball velocity with biomechanical predictors

被引:11
|
作者
Nicholson, K. F. [1 ,5 ]
Collins, G. S. [2 ,3 ]
Waterman, B. R. [1 ]
Bullock, G. S. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winston Salem, NC USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Ctr Sport, Exercise & Osteoarthritis Res Versus Arthrit, Oxford, England
[5] 1 Med Ctr Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27103 USA
关键词
Calibration; Root mean square error; Kinetic Chain; Baseball; Performance; Pitching; BASEBALL PITCHERS; PITCHING BIOMECHANICS; TRUNK ROTATION; SAMPLE-SIZE; SHOULDER; PERFORMANCE; MECHANICS; INJURY; MODELS; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.110999
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
In recent years, one of the most important factors for success among baseball pitchers is fastball velocity. The purpose of this study was to (1) to develop statistical and machine learning models of fastball velocity, (2) to identify the strongest predictors of fastball velocity, and (3) to compare the models' prediction performances. Three dimensional biomechanical analyses were performed on high school (n = 165) and college (n = 62) baseball pitchers. A total of 16 kinetic and kinematic predictors from the entire pitching sequence were included in regression and machine learning models. All models were internally validated through ten-fold cross -validation. Model performance was evaluated through root mean square error (RMSE) and calibration with 95% confidence intervals. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated the best prediction performance [RMSE: 0.34; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.999, 1.001)], while regression demonstrated the greatest prediction error [RMSE: 2.49; Calibration: 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.15)]. Maximum elbow extension velocity (relative influence: 19.3%), maximum humeral rotation velocity (9.6%), maximum lead leg ground reaction force resultant (9.1%), trunk forward flexion at release (7.9%), time difference of maximum pelvis rotation velocity and maximum trunk rotation velocity (7.8%) demonstrated the greatest influence on pitch velocity. Gradient boosting machines demonstrated better calibration and reduced RMSE compared to regression. The influence of lead leg ground reaction force resultant and trunk and arm kinematics on pitch velocity demonstrates the interdependent relationship of the entire kinetic chain during the pitching motion. Coaches, players, and performance professionals should focus on the identified metrics when designing pitch velocity improvement programs.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statistical Prediction and Machine Learning
    Govind, Sabeen
    Chen, John Tuhao
    Chen, Lincy Y.
    Lee, Clement
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2025,
  • [2] Statistical Prediction and Machine Learning
    Jogo, Fransiskus Serfian
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2025, 67 (01) : 184 - 185
  • [3] A machine learning approach for the prediction of settling velocity
    Goldstein, Evan B.
    Coco, Giovanni
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (04) : 3595 - 3601
  • [4] A hybrid physics and machine learning approach for velocity prediction
    Liu, Di
    Zou, Changchun
    Song, Qianggong
    Wan, Zhonghong
    Zhao, Haizhen
    Leading Edge, 2022, 41 (06): : 382 - 391
  • [5] Crop Type Prediction: A Statistical and Machine Learning Approach
    Bhuyan, Bikram Pratim
    Tomar, Ravi
    Singh, T. P.
    Cherif, Amar Ramdane
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [6] Statistical Machine Learning Approaches to Liver Disease Prediction
    Mostafa, Fahad
    Hasan, Easin
    Williamson, Morgan
    Khan, Hafiz
    LIVERS, 2021, 1 (04): : 294 - 312
  • [7] Statistical and Machine Learning Methods for Electricity Demand Prediction
    Kotillova, Alexandra
    Koprinska, Irena
    Rana, Mashud
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, ICONIP 2012, PT II, 2012, 7664 : 535 - 542
  • [8] A Review and Analysis of Machine Learning and Statistical Approaches for Prediction
    Nisha, K. G.
    Sreekumar, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICICCT), 2017, : 135 - 139
  • [9] Machine Learning and Statistical Prediction of Pitching Arm Kinetics
    Nicholson, Kristen F.
    Collins, Gary S.
    Waterman, Brian R.
    Bullock, Garrett S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01): : 238 - 247
  • [10] Velocity Prediction of a Pipeline Inspection Gauge (PIG) with Machine Learning
    Galvao De Freitas, Victor Carvalho
    De Araujo, Valberio Gonzaga
    de Carvalho Crisostomo, Daniel Carlos
    De Lima, Gustavo Fernandes
    Doria Neto, Adriao Duarte
    Salazar, Andres Ortiz
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (23)