The Kessler psychological distress scale: translation and validation of an Arabic version

被引:119
|
作者
Easton, Scott D. [1 ]
Safadi, Najwa S. [2 ]
Wang, Yihan [1 ]
Hasson, Robert G., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Sch Social Work, 140 Commonwealth Ave,McGuinn Hall,Room 207, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[2] Al Quds Univ, Dept Social Work, Main Campus,POB 51000, Jerusalem, Palestine
来源
关键词
Kessler psychological distress scale; Palestine; Occupied Palestinian territories; Arabic; Mental distress; Confirmatory factor analysis; SERIOUS MENTAL-ILLNESS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ANXIETY DISORDERS; SCREENING SCALES; K10; K6; HEALTH; VALIDITY; POPULATION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-017-0783-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale has been widely used in assessing psychological distress among general and clinical populations from different cultural backgrounds. To our knowledge, however, researchers have not yet validated any translated versions in Arabic. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of Arabic translations of the ten item (K10) and six item (K6) versions among public sector employees in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Methods: As part of a larger research project on life satisfaction, researchers collected data from 234 Palestinian social workers in June and July of 2016. The survey included several mental health measures, including the K10, which were translated from English to Arabic by an experienced language expert. In the current study, we tested reliability by measuring internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Next, we assessed factor structure using variance-covariance matrix with maximum likelihood estimation. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine three competing models: unidimensional K10 model, unidimensional K6 model and two-factor K6 model. Fit indices and parameter estimates were reported. Last, convergent validity was examined by assessing correlations with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) and Somatic Symptoms Scale (SSS-8). Results: The mean scores for the K6 and K10 were, respectively, 12.87 (SD = 4.02) and 21.8 (SD = 6.7), indicative of mild to moderate levels of distress. Scale reliability analysis showed satisfactory results on both K6 and K10 versions (Cronbach's alpha = .81 (K6) and .88 (K10)). Among three competing models, the two-factor K6 scale demonstrated the best model fit with high factorial correlations (r = .60, p < .001). Moreover, the K6 has high convergent validity with GAD-7 (r = .66, p < .001) and SSS-8 (r = .61, p < .001). Conclusion: Results indicated that the translated version of the two-factor K6 scale is a valid and reliable measurement of psychological distress. Our findings suggest that practitioners and researchers can use this instrument in screening and assessing psychological symptoms with Arabic-speaking populations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Translation and validation of the Cardiac Depression Scale to Arabic
    Papasavvas, T.
    Al-Amin, H.
    Ghabrash, H. F.
    Micklewright, D.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 22 : 60 - 66
  • [32] Turkish adaptation of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: validity and reliability study
    Altun, Yasin
    Ozen, Mehmet
    Kuloglu, Mehmet Murat
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 20 : 23 - 31
  • [33] Validity of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale in Brazilian higher education students
    Perrelli, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque
    de Vasconcelos, Gabriel Vinicius Souza
    Correia e Sa, Jessica Rodrigues
    de Medeiros, Pollyanna Fausta Pimentel
    Uchoa, Roberta
    Sanchez, Zila
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 32
  • [34] Validity of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale in Brazilian higher education students
    Perrelli, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque
    de Vasconcelos, Gabriel Vinicius Souza
    Correia e Sa, Jessica Rodrigues
    de Medeiros, Pollyanna Fausta Pimentel
    Uchoa, Roberta
    Sanchez, Zila
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 32
  • [35] Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
    Andrews, G
    Slade, T
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (06) : 494 - 497
  • [36] VALIDATION OF THE KESSLER'S PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE (K10 & K6) IN A MALAYSIAN POPULATION
    Tiong, Xun Ting
    Abdullah, Nur Sara Shahira
    Bujang, Mohamad Adam
    Sapri, Fatin Ellisya Binti
    Ratnasingam, Selvasingam
    Joon, Chong Kok
    Wee, Hwee Lin
    Venkataraman, Kavita
    Tai, E. Shyong
    Fong, Alan Yean Yip
    ASEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 19 (01): : 77 - 85
  • [37] Validity of the Kessler Psychological Distress scale in Brazilian higher education students
    Perrelli, Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque
    de Vasconcelos, Gabriel Vinicius Souza
    Sa, Jessica Rodrigues
    de Medeiros, Pollyanna Fausta Pimentel
    Uchoa, Roberta
    Sanchez, Zila
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 32
  • [38] Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the menstrual distress questionnaire
    Chang, Hsin-Huei
    Hsu, Ya-Chien
    Liao, Wen-Ling
    Lo, Chyi
    Chang, Cherry Yin-Yi
    Liao, Chun-Hui
    Su, Shan-Yu
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [39] Validation of the Danish version of diabetes distress scale
    Joensen, L. E.
    Tapager, I.
    Willaing, I.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 : S401 - S401
  • [40] Assessing psychological resilience: translation and validation of the Chinese version of the resilience evaluation scale (RES)
    Qing, Yulan
    Bakker, Anne
    van der Meer, Christianne A., I
    te Brake, Hans
    Olff, Miranda
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2022, 13 (02)