Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

被引:82
|
作者
Moberg, AC [1 ]
Berndsen, F [1 ]
Palmquist, I [1 ]
Petersson, U [1 ]
Resch, T [1 ]
Montgomery, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4842
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopy is safe for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. This study compared recovery after laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) for confirmed appendicitis, carried out by experienced surgeons in an educational setting. Methods: One hundred and sixty-three patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis suitable for LA were randomized prospectively to either LA or OA in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was time to full recovery. Secondary endpoints were operating time, complications, hospital stay and functional status. Results: There was no significant difference between LA and OA in time to full recovery (9 and 11 days respectively; P = 0.225). Operating time was 55 min in the LA group and 60 min in the OA group (P = 0.416). The complication rate was 8.6 and 11.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.696), and median hospital stay was 2 days in both groups (P = 0.192). Functional status was significantly better in the LA group 7-10 days after operation (P = 0.045). Conclusion: There was no difference in time to full recovery after LA and OA in patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis. A trend towards better physical activity was noted after the laparoscopic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair
    Juul, P
    Christensen, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (03) : 316 - 319
  • [42] Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
    Johansson, M
    Thune, A
    Nelvin, L
    Stiernstam, M
    Westman, B
    Lundell, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [43] Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: A prospective study
    Chiarugi, M
    Buccianti, P
    Celona, G
    Decanini, L
    Martino, MC
    Goletti, O
    Cavina, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 162 (05) : 385 - 390
  • [44] Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Neogi, Sujoy
    Banerjee, Arka
    Panda, Shasanka S.
    Ratan, Simmi K.
    Narang, Raghav
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2022, 57 (03) : 394 - 405
  • [45] Re: Rectus sheath block for laparoscopic appendicectomy: a randomized clinical trial
    Little, Tim
    Roberts, Jessica
    Hamill, James
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (05) : 420 - 421
  • [46] Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: the debate continues
    Laird, O.
    Cosgrove, C.
    Williams, R.
    Lambert, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 105 - 105
  • [47] Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in obese patients
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Venkat-Raman, Vishal
    Ho, Alison
    Karthikesalingam, Alan
    Kinross, James
    Evans, Jessica
    Bloom, Ian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 9 (06) : 451 - 455
  • [48] Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Greek Reality
    Lanitis, Sophocles
    Korontzi, Maria
    Sgourakis, George
    Karkoulias, Kyriakos
    Kontovounisios, Christos
    Karaliotas, Constantine
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (05): : 471 - 476
  • [49] Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy - A critical review
    Kapischke, M.
    Caliebe, A.
    Tepel, J.
    Schulz, T.
    Hedderich, J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (07): : 1060 - 1068
  • [50] Economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis from the APPAC randomized clinical trial
    Sippola, S.
    Gronroos, J.
    Tuominen, R.
    Paajanen, H.
    Rautio, T.
    Nordstrom, P.
    Aarnio, M.
    Rantanen, T.
    Hurme, S.
    Salminen, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (10) : 1355 - 1361