Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

被引:82
|
作者
Moberg, AC [1 ]
Berndsen, F [1 ]
Palmquist, I [1 ]
Petersson, U [1 ]
Resch, T [1 ]
Montgomery, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4842
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopy is safe for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. This study compared recovery after laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) for confirmed appendicitis, carried out by experienced surgeons in an educational setting. Methods: One hundred and sixty-three patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis suitable for LA were randomized prospectively to either LA or OA in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was time to full recovery. Secondary endpoints were operating time, complications, hospital stay and functional status. Results: There was no significant difference between LA and OA in time to full recovery (9 and 11 days respectively; P = 0.225). Operating time was 55 min in the LA group and 60 min in the OA group (P = 0.416). The complication rate was 8.6 and 11.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.696), and median hospital stay was 2 days in both groups (P = 0.192). Functional status was significantly better in the LA group 7-10 days after operation (P = 0.045). Conclusion: There was no difference in time to full recovery after LA and OA in patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis. A trend towards better physical activity was noted after the laparoscopic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: Reply
    Hassen, AHS
    Cade, RJ
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (12): : 839 - 839
  • [32] Rectus sheath block for laparoscopic appendicectomy: a randomized clinical trial
    Hamill, James K.
    Liley, Andrew
    Hill, Andrew G.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (12) : 951 - 956
  • [33] Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair
    Asencio, Francisco
    Aguilo, Javier
    Peiro, Salvador
    Carbo, Juan
    Ferri, Ramon
    Caro, Federico
    Ahmad, Marwan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (07): : 1441 - 1448
  • [34] Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair
    Francisco Asencio
    Javier Aguiló
    Salvador Peiró
    Juan Carbó
    Ramón Ferri
    Federico Caro
    Marwan Ahmad
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23
  • [35] Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy
    Reiertsen, O
    Larsen, S
    Trondsen, E
    Edwin, B
    Faerden, AE
    Rosseland, AR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (06) : 842 - 847
  • [36] A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDICECTOMY VERSUS OPEN APPENDICECTOMY
    Roy, Joy
    Mukhopadhyay, Arunima
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (33): : 3657 - 3660
  • [37] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy (Br J Surg 2001; 88: 200-5) - Letter 1
    Banerjee, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (08) : 1132 - 1132
  • [38] Open Versus Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Pereira, Chirag
    Rai, Rakesh
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [39] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours
    Palanivelu, C.
    Senthilnathan, P.
    Sabnis, S. C.
    Babu, N. S.
    Gurumurthy, S. Srivatsan
    Vijai, N. Anand
    Nalankilli, V. P.
    Raj, P. Praveen
    Parthasarathy, R.
    Rajapandian, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (11) : 1443 - 1450
  • [40] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection
    Braga, M.
    Frasson, M.
    Zuliani, W.
    Vignali, A.
    Pecorelli, N.
    Di Carlo, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (08) : 1180 - 1186