Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

被引:82
|
作者
Moberg, AC [1 ]
Berndsen, F [1 ]
Palmquist, I [1 ]
Petersson, U [1 ]
Resch, T [1 ]
Montgomery, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4842
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopy is safe for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. This study compared recovery after laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) for confirmed appendicitis, carried out by experienced surgeons in an educational setting. Methods: One hundred and sixty-three patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis suitable for LA were randomized prospectively to either LA or OA in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was time to full recovery. Secondary endpoints were operating time, complications, hospital stay and functional status. Results: There was no significant difference between LA and OA in time to full recovery (9 and 11 days respectively; P = 0.225). Operating time was 55 min in the LA group and 60 min in the OA group (P = 0.416). The complication rate was 8.6 and 11.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.696), and median hospital stay was 2 days in both groups (P = 0.192). Functional status was significantly better in the LA group 7-10 days after operation (P = 0.045). Conclusion: There was no difference in time to full recovery after LA and OA in patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis. A trend towards better physical activity was noted after the laparoscopic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unsclected patients
    Agarwal, B. B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (10) : 1225 - 1225
  • [22] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety
    Thomson, John-Edwin
    Kruger, Deirdre
    Jann-Kruger, Christine
    Kiss, Akos
    Omoshoro-Jones, J. A. O.
    Luvhengo, Thifheli
    Brand, Martin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (07): : 2027 - 2032
  • [23] Outcomes for open and laparoscopic appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis in children
    Fourie, N.
    de Vos, C.
    Sidler, D.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 60 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [24] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety
    John-Edwin Thomson
    Deirdré Kruger
    Christine Jann-Kruger
    Akos Kiss
    J. A. O. Omoshoro-Jones
    Thifheli Luvhengo
    Martin Brand
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 2027 - 2032
  • [25] Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients
    Hansson, J.
    Korner, U.
    Khorram-Manesh, A.
    Solberg, A.
    Lundholm, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (05) : 473 - 481
  • [26] Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis
    Quah, Gaik S.
    Eslick, Guy D.
    Cox, Michael R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2072 - 2082
  • [27] Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in obese patients: a prospective randomized comparison
    Moustafa, Asem
    Mazlom, Alaa
    Abo-Bakr, Fawzy
    El-Meligy, Mohammed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (02): : 822 - 827
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in the elderly
    Adwan, H.
    Weerasuriya, C. K.
    Endleman, P.
    Stewart, L.
    Justin, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 175 - 176
  • [29] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy (Br J Surg 2001; 88: 200-5) - Reply
    Pedersen, AG
    Wara, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (08) : 1133 - 1133
  • [30] Perforated appendicitis treated with laparoscopic appendicectomy or open appendicectomy: A meta-analysis
    Gu, Qianquan
    Hua, Ye
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2023, 19 (03) : 348 - 354