Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations

被引:53
|
作者
Briso, A. L. F.
Mestrener, S. R.
Delicio, G.
Sundfeld, R. H.
Bedran-Russo, A. K.
de Alexandre, R. S.
Ambrosano, G. M. B.
机构
[1] UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
[2] UIC, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Community Hlth, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.2341/06-141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This incidence of postoperative sensitivity was evaluated in resin-based posterior restorations. Two hundred and ninety-two direct restorations were evaluated in premolars and molars. A total of 143 Class I and 149 Class 11 restorations (MO/OD and MOD) were placed in patients ranging in age from 30 to 50 years. After the cavity preparations were completed, a rubber dam was placed, and the preparations were restored using a total-etch system (Prime & Bond NT) and a resin-based restorative material (TPH Spectrum). The patients were contacted after 24 hours and 7, 30 and 90 days postoperatively and questioned regarding the presence of sensitivity and the stimuli that triggered that sensitivity. The Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Test were used for statistical analysis. Evaluation at 24 hours after restorative treatment revealed statistically significant differences among the types of cavity preparations restored and the occurrence of postoperative sensitivity (p=0.0003), with a higher frequency of sensitivity in Class H MOD restorations (26%), followed by Class II MO/DO (15%) and Class I restorations (5%). At 7, 30 and 90 days after restorative treatment, there was a decrease in the occurrence of sensitivity for all groups. The percentage of sensitivity among the groups was not significantly different. This study shows that the occurrence of sensitivity is correlated with the complexity of the restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 426
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer does not influence postoperative sensitivity and clinical performance of posterior restorations: A 24-month randomized clinical trial
    Hanzen, Taise Alessandra
    de Paula, Alexandra Mara
    Grokoski, Eduardo
    Macedo de Oliveira, Isabelle Lins
    Arana-Gordillo, Luis Alfonso
    de Melo Monteiro, Gabriela Queiroz
    Perdigao, Jorge
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2023, 39 (10) : 946 - 956
  • [42] PATTERN OF WEAR IN POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS
    KUSY, RP
    LEINFELDER, KF
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1977, 56 (05) : 544 - 544
  • [43] Radiopacity of composite resins for posterior restorations
    Kraul, A
    Loguercio, AD
    Reis, A
    Bauer, J
    Filho, LE
    Oda, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B115 - B115
  • [44] Your next composite for posterior restorations
    不详
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 237 (01) : 60 - 60
  • [45] CONTROVERSIES IN POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS
    WILSON, EG
    MANDRADJIEFF, M
    BRINDOCK, T
    DENTAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1990, 34 (01) : 27 - 44
  • [46] Composite resin restorations on posterior teeth
    Spreafico, RC
    Gagliani, M
    ADHESION: THE SILENT REVOLUTION IN DENTISTRY, 2000, : 253 - 276
  • [47] A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF POSTERIOR RESTORATIONS
    BAYNE, SC
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1990, 69 : 341 - 341
  • [48] Micromorphologic longitudinal assessment of long-term performing posterior composite restorations
    Gaengler, P
    Kamann, W
    Schmitz, I
    Mueller, KM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1238 - 1238
  • [49] Qualitative assessment of posterior composite resin restorations using the CPM index.
    Gaengler, P.
    Kamann, W.
    Hoyer, I.
    Montag, R.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B306 - B306
  • [50] THE PREVALENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE SENSITIVITY IN TEETH RESTORED WITH CLASS-II COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS
    BORGMEIJER, PJ
    KREULEN, CM
    VANAMERONGEN, WE
    AKERBOOM, HBM
    GRUYTHUYSEN, RJM
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1991, 58 (05): : 378 - 383