Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations

被引:53
|
作者
Briso, A. L. F.
Mestrener, S. R.
Delicio, G.
Sundfeld, R. H.
Bedran-Russo, A. K.
de Alexandre, R. S.
Ambrosano, G. M. B.
机构
[1] UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
[2] UIC, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Community Hlth, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.2341/06-141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This incidence of postoperative sensitivity was evaluated in resin-based posterior restorations. Two hundred and ninety-two direct restorations were evaluated in premolars and molars. A total of 143 Class I and 149 Class 11 restorations (MO/OD and MOD) were placed in patients ranging in age from 30 to 50 years. After the cavity preparations were completed, a rubber dam was placed, and the preparations were restored using a total-etch system (Prime & Bond NT) and a resin-based restorative material (TPH Spectrum). The patients were contacted after 24 hours and 7, 30 and 90 days postoperatively and questioned regarding the presence of sensitivity and the stimuli that triggered that sensitivity. The Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Test were used for statistical analysis. Evaluation at 24 hours after restorative treatment revealed statistically significant differences among the types of cavity preparations restored and the occurrence of postoperative sensitivity (p=0.0003), with a higher frequency of sensitivity in Class H MOD restorations (26%), followed by Class II MO/DO (15%) and Class I restorations (5%). At 7, 30 and 90 days after restorative treatment, there was a decrease in the occurrence of sensitivity for all groups. The percentage of sensitivity among the groups was not significantly different. This study shows that the occurrence of sensitivity is correlated with the complexity of the restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 426
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS - ONE YEAR RESULTS
    RICHARDSON, AS
    DERKSON, GD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 : 322 - 322
  • [32] Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results
    Busato, ALS
    Loguercio, AD
    Reis, A
    Carrilho, MRD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 14 (05): : 304 - 308
  • [33] The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application
    Ugurlu, Muhittin
    Sari, Fatmanur
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (09) : 5785 - 5793
  • [34] Clinical and Micromorphologic 29-year Results of Posterior Composite Restorations
    Montag, R.
    Dietz, W.
    Nietzsche, S.
    Lang, T.
    Weich, K.
    Sigusch, B. W.
    Gaengler, P.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 97 (13) : 1431 - 1437
  • [35] Longitudinal clinical 10 year results of posterior GIC/composite restorations
    Montag, R
    Hoyer, I
    Gaengler, P
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 953 - 953
  • [36] AIC contest for the best clinical case: composite restorations in the posterior region
    Ganau, Chiara
    DENTAL CADMOS, 2021, 89 (03) : 228 - 231
  • [37] The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application
    Muhittin Ugurlu
    Fatmanur Sari
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 5785 - 5793
  • [38] A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings
    da Rosa Rodolpho, Paulo Antonio
    Cenci, Maximiliano Sergio
    Donassollo, Tiago Aurelio
    Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
    Demarco, Flavio Fernando
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2006, 34 (07) : 427 - 435
  • [39] QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF CLINICAL WEAR OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS
    URQUIOLA, NJ
    CHARBENEAU, GT
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 : 583 - 583
  • [40] BIOLOGICAL TESTING AND CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS
    HOYER, I
    GANGLER, P
    KREHAN, F
    NIEMELA, S
    WEINERT, W
    DEUTSCHE ZAHNARZTLICHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1989, 44 (02): : 100 - 105