Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations

被引:53
|
作者
Briso, A. L. F.
Mestrener, S. R.
Delicio, G.
Sundfeld, R. H.
Bedran-Russo, A. K.
de Alexandre, R. S.
Ambrosano, G. M. B.
机构
[1] UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
[2] UIC, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Community Hlth, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.2341/06-141
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This incidence of postoperative sensitivity was evaluated in resin-based posterior restorations. Two hundred and ninety-two direct restorations were evaluated in premolars and molars. A total of 143 Class I and 149 Class 11 restorations (MO/OD and MOD) were placed in patients ranging in age from 30 to 50 years. After the cavity preparations were completed, a rubber dam was placed, and the preparations were restored using a total-etch system (Prime & Bond NT) and a resin-based restorative material (TPH Spectrum). The patients were contacted after 24 hours and 7, 30 and 90 days postoperatively and questioned regarding the presence of sensitivity and the stimuli that triggered that sensitivity. The Chi-square and Fisher's Exact Test were used for statistical analysis. Evaluation at 24 hours after restorative treatment revealed statistically significant differences among the types of cavity preparations restored and the occurrence of postoperative sensitivity (p=0.0003), with a higher frequency of sensitivity in Class H MOD restorations (26%), followed by Class II MO/DO (15%) and Class I restorations (5%). At 7, 30 and 90 days after restorative treatment, there was a decrease in the occurrence of sensitivity for all groups. The percentage of sensitivity among the groups was not significantly different. This study shows that the occurrence of sensitivity is correlated with the complexity of the restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 426
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Testing criteria for clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations.
    Christensen, N
    Tveit, AB
    Qvist, V
    Espelid, I
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B362 - B362
  • [22] MICROSTRUCTURE OF POSTERIOR RESTORATIONS OF COMPOSITE RESIN AFTER CLINICAL WEAR
    OBRIEN, WJ
    YEE, J
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1980, 5 (03) : 90 - 94
  • [23] Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: A pilot study.
    Pesun, IJ
    Pintato, M
    Holtan, J
    Lee, PK
    Chau, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 236 - 236
  • [24] Microleakage in posterior composite restorations
    Mato, GA
    Ginzler, BM
    Neme, AL
    Maxson, BB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 182 - 182
  • [25] Longevity of posterior composite restorations
    Raj, Vishnu
    Macedo, Georgia V.
    Ritter, Andre V.
    Swift, Edward J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2007, 19 (01) : 3 - 5
  • [26] MICROLEAKAGE OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS
    GROSS, JD
    RETIEF, DH
    BRADLEY, EL
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 : 179 - 179
  • [27] Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo
    Opdam, NJM
    Roeters, FJM
    Feilzer, AJ
    Verdonschot, EH
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1998, 26 (07) : 555 - 562
  • [28] Ten-year Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations
    Kraemer, Norbert
    Reinelt, Christian
    Frankenberger, Roland
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 17 (05): : 433 - 441
  • [29] Clinical Performance of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations in Patients with Amelogenesis Imperfecta
    Tekce, N.
    Demirci, M.
    Sancak, E., I
    Guder, G.
    Tuncer, S.
    Baydemir, C.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 47 (06) : 620 - 629
  • [30] Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations
    Al-Asmar, Ayah A.
    HA Sabrah, Alaa
    Abd-Raheam, Islam M.
    Ismail, Noor H.
    Oweis, Yara G.
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2023, 35 (03) : 275 - 281