Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Brachial Plexus-Associated Neuropathy After High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer
    Chen, Allen M.
    Hall, William H.
    Li, Judy
    Beckett, Laurel
    Farwell, D. Gregory
    Lau, Derick H.
    Purdy, James A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (01): : 165 - 169
  • [42] Delineating Neck Targets for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer
    Ben David, Merav
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2011, 43 : 255 - 270
  • [43] Correlating Planned Radiation Dose to the Cochlea With Primary Site and Tumor Stage in Head-and-Neck Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Zhang, J.
    Qureshi, M. M.
    Kovalchuk, N.
    Truong, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S529 - S530
  • [44] Intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma
    Wolden, SL
    Wexler, L
    Kraus, D
    La Quaglia, M
    Lis, E
    Meyers, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S246 - S247
  • [45] Occipital Alopecia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT)
    Rosenthal, D. I.
    Mohamed, A. S. R.
    Gunn, G. B.
    Garden, A. S.
    Fuller, C. D.
    Phan, J.
    Nguyen, Q.
    Amin, M.
    Zhu, X. R.
    Anderson, M.
    Mohan, R.
    Frank, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E347 - E347
  • [46] Protection of salivary function by intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer
    Chao, KSC
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [47] Patterns of failure in patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer
    Thorstad, W
    Hong, S
    Hope, AJ
    Lindsay, PE
    Haughey, B
    Deasey, JO
    Chao, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S74 - S74
  • [48] Planning comparison between intensity modulated radiation therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in a case of head and neck cancer
    Nguyen, T. T. C.
    Nguyen, B. T.
    Mai, N. V.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION 2017 (ICMSE2017), 2018, 983
  • [49] Head and neck sarcoma: report of a case treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Pierre Heudel
    Marie Claude Biston
    Jérome Fayette
    Antoine Ramade
    Frédéric Gassa
    Pascal Pommier
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2010, 15 : 305 - 309
  • [50] Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Is it Affordable?
    Vanderstraeten, B.
    Berwouts, D.
    Goddeeris, B.
    Duprez, F.
    De Neve, W.
    Lievens, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S107 - S108