Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the management of head and neck cancer
    Hong, TS
    Tomé, WA
    Harari, PM
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2005, 17 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [32] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2005, 2 (01): : 34 - 39
  • [33] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer
    Avraham Eisbruch
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2005, 2 : 34 - 39
  • [34] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head and neck cancers. Dose constraint for spinal cord and brachial plexus
    Boisselier, P.
    Racadot, S.
    Thariat, J.
    Graff, P.
    Pointreau, Y.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2016, 20 (6-7): : 459 - 466
  • [35] Posttreatment Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy
    O'Neill, Michael
    Heron, Dwight E.
    Flickinger, John C.
    Smith, Ryan
    Ferris, Robert L.
    Gibson, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 34 (05): : 478 - 482
  • [36] Dosimetric analysis and clinical outcomes of brachial plexus as an organ-at-risk in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Prakash, Bhanu B.
    Yathiraj, Prahlad H.
    Sharan, T. Krishna
    Singh, Anshul
    Reddy, Anusha S.
    Chandraguthi, Srinidhi G.
    Subramanian, Ramya Bala
    Nagesh, Jyothi
    Nair, Sarath S.
    Fernandes, Donald J.
    Mamidipudi, Vidyasagar S.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (03) : 522 - 527
  • [37] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer:: Prescribed dose, clinical challenges and results
    Martin, Etienne
    Deville, Coralie
    Bonnetain, Franck
    Bosset, Mathieu
    Crehange, Gilles
    Truc, Gilles
    Naudy, Suzanne
    Maingon, Philippe
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 85 (03) : 392 - 398
  • [38] The effect of intravenous contrast on intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose calculations for head and neck cancer
    Liauw, SL
    Amdur, RJ
    Mendenhall, WM
    Palta, J
    Kim, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2005, 28 (05): : 456 - 459
  • [39] Evaluation of Parotid Gland Dose Rate following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer
    Hong, Joo-Wan
    Cho, Jae-Hwan
    Won, Hui-Su
    Moon, Deog-Hwan
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2015, 48 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [40] Dose-Volume Modeling of Brachial Plexus-Associated Neuropathy After Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Beitler, Jonathan J.
    Jegadeesh, Naresh K.
    Higgins, Kristin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 (02): : 474 - 475