Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Ozyigit G.
    Yang T.
    Chao K.S.C.
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2004, 5 (1) : 3 - 9
  • [22] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Chou, WW
    Puri, DR
    Lee, NY
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2005, 5 (03) : 515 - 521
  • [23] Correlating planned radiation dose to the cochlea with primary site and tumor stage in patients with head and neck cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Zhang, Jeanette
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    Truong, Minh Tam
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2014, 39 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [24] An analysis of quality of life data in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    O'Neill, M. J.
    Heron, D. E.
    Andrade, R. S.
    Flickinger, J. C.
    Smith, R. P.
    Burton, S. A.
    Quinn, A. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S588 - S588
  • [25] Predictive value of tumor microRNAs in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Ahmad, Parwez
    Sana, Jiri
    Vecera, Marek
    Juracek, Jaroslav
    Machackova, Tana
    Gablo, Natalia Anna
    Svoboda, Marek
    Hermanova, Marketa
    Slavik, Marek
    Slampa, Pavel
    Smilek, Pavel
    Slaby, Ondrej
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [26] DOSIMETRIC AND CLINICAL EVALUATION OF BRACHIAL PLEXOPATHY IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD AND NECK CANCER TREATED WITH INTENSITY MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY
    Igdem, S.
    Hanagasi, F.
    Solakoglu, C.
    Alco, G.
    Ercan, T.
    Altun, M.
    Turkan, S.
    Okkan, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 : S21 - S21
  • [27] Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the mandible in head/neck cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
    Gomez, D. R.
    Zelefsky, M. J.
    Wolden, S. L.
    Estilo, C. L.
    Fury, M. G.
    Pfister, D. G.
    Wong, R. J.
    Kraus, D. H.
    Lee, N. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S410 - S410
  • [28] Factors associated with radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Monroe, Alan T.
    Reddy, Sathya C.
    Gibbs, Gregory L.
    White, Gerald A.
    Peddada, Anuj V.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 87 (02) : 188 - 194
  • [29] Importance of Radiation Oncologist Experience Among Patients With Head-and-Neck Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Boero, Isabel J.
    Paravati, Anthony J.
    Xu, Beibei
    Cohen, Ezra E. W.
    Mell, Loren K.
    Quynh-Thu Le
    Murphy, James D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07) : 684 - +
  • [30] Skin dose in conventional conformal and intensity modulated head and neck radiation therapy
    Bulling, S
    Bresson, S
    Do, HP
    Pache, G
    Ozsahin, M
    Mirimanoff, RO
    Valley, JF
    Moeckli, R
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2005, 181 : 137 - 137