Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy

被引:15
|
作者
Thomas, Tarita O. [1 ]
Refaat, Tamer [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Choi, Mehee [1 ]
Bacchus, Ian [1 ]
Sachdev, Sean [1 ]
Rademaker, Alfred W. [2 ]
Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam [1 ]
Karagianis, Achilles [3 ]
Mittal, Bharat B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] NMDTI, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Clin Oncol & Nucl Med, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Brachial plexus; Radiation; Tolerance; NORMAL TISSUE; PLEXOPATHY; COMPLICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0409-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to study the radiation induced brachial plexopathy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (S-IMRT). Methods and materials: This IRB approved study included 68 patients with HNSCC treated consecutively. Detailed dose volume histogram data was generated for ipsilateral and contralateral brachial plexus (BP) volumes receiving a specified dose (Vds) i.e. V50-V75 and dose in Gray covering specified percent of BP volume (Dvs) i.e. D5-D30 and maximum point doses (Dmax). To assess BP injury all patients' charts were reviewed in detail for sign and symptoms of BP damage. Post-hoc comparisons were done using Tukey-Kramer method to account for multiple significance testing. Results: The mean and maximum doses to BP were significantly different (p < .05) based on tumor site, nodal status and tumor stage. The mean volume to the ipsilateral BP for V50, V60, V70, and V75 were 7.01 cc, 4.37 cc, 1.47 cc and 0.24 cc, respectively. The mean dose delivered to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP was 68.70 Gy (median 69.5Gy). None of the patients had acute or late brachial plexopathy or any other significant neurological complications, with a minimum follow up of two years (mean 54 months). Conclusions: In this study cohort, at a minimum of two-years follow up, the mean dose of 68.7Gy, a median dose to 69.5Gy to <= 5% of ipsilateral BP, and a median Dmax of 72.96Gy did not result in BP injury when patients were treated with S-IMRT technique. However, longer follow up is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Tarita O Thomas
    Tamer Refaat
    Mehee Choi
    Ian Bacchus
    Sean Sachdev
    Alfred W Rademaker
    Vythialingam Sathiaseelan
    Achilles Karagianis
    Bharat B Mittal
    Radiation Oncology, 10
  • [2] Brachial Plexus Dose Tolerance in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Sequential Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Thomas, T. O.
    Refaat, T.
    Choi, M.
    Bacchus, I.
    Sathiaseelan, V.
    Mittal, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S524 - S524
  • [3] Evaluation of dose to the brachial plexus using intensity modulated radiation therapy for treatment of head and neck cancer
    Millender, LE
    Bucci, MK
    Quivey, JM
    Chin, CT
    Xia, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S505 - S505
  • [4] Dose Volume Histogram Analysis of Routine Brachial Plexus Contouring for Head and Neck Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Truong, M.
    Romesser, P. B.
    Qureshi, M. M.
    Orlina, L.
    Willins, J. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S532 - S532
  • [5] Dosimetric Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of Brachial Plexus as an Organ-at-Risk in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Yathiraj, P. H.
    Prakash, B.
    Sharan, K.
    Singh, A.
    Reddy, S. A.
    Chandraguthy, S. G.
    Balasubramanian, R.
    Nagesh, J.
    Nair, S. S.
    Fernandes, D.
    Vidyasagar, M. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E379 - E380
  • [6] Skin dose for head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)
    Fu, Hsiao-Ju
    Li, Chi-Wei
    Tsai, Wei-Ta
    Chang, Chih-Chia
    Tsang, Yuk-Wah
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 140 : 435 - 441
  • [7] Radiation Dose to the Brachial Plexus in Head-and-Neck Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Its Relationship to Tumor and Nodal Stage
    Minh Tam Truong
    Romesser, Paul B.
    Qureshi, Muhammad M.
    Kovalchuk, Nataliya
    Orlina, Lawrence
    Willins, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (01): : 158 - 164
  • [8] Predicting Differences in Planned and Delivered Dose for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Reese, A. S.
    Hou, J.
    Suntharalingam, M.
    D'Souza, W. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S800 - S800
  • [9] Intensity modulated radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer
    Eagin, K.
    Bas, H.
    Guden, M.
    Kucuk, N.
    Cemile, C.
    Egehan, I.
    Kilic, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 : S61 - S61
  • [10] Impact of setup error on integral dose in head and neck cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Prabhakar, R. V.
    Haresh, K. P.
    Laviraj, M. A.
    Rath, G. K.
    Julka, P. K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)