Agreement in central corneal thickness measurement between Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer

被引:4
|
作者
Salouti, Ramin [1 ,2 ]
Razeghinejad, Reza [3 ]
Masihpour, Nasrin [1 ]
Ghoreyshi, Maryam [2 ,4 ]
Nowroozzadeh, M. Hossein [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Poostchi Ophthalmol Res Ctr, Poostchi Clin, Zand St, Shiraz 7134997446, Iran
[2] Salouti Eye Clin, Salouti Cornea Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Wills Eye Hosp & Res Inst, Glaucoma Serv, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Agreement; Central corneal thickness; Corvis ST; Ocular response analyzer; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; HYPERTENSION TREATMENT; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; STATISTICAL-METHODS; NONCONTACT; TOPOGRAPHY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-020-01436-y
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the agreement and interchangeability of noncontact devices of ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST in central corneal thickness measurement. Methods In this prospective comparative study, central corneal thickness (CCT) readings of 284 healthy, nonglaucoma subjects, without previous ocular surgery, were measured with ORA and Corvis ST. Only data from right eyes were analyzed. The mean values of CCT measurements by the ORA versus Corvis ST were compared with the paired sample t test. Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (95% LOA) were used to assess the agreement between the measurements of the two devices. Results The mean (+/- standard deviation) age of the participants was 28.0 +/- 4.9 years, and 36.6% were male. The mean CCT measurements were 555 +/- 32 mu m by the ORA and 536 +/- 32 mu m with the Corvis ST (P < 0.001). The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.964 (P < 0.001). The 95% LOA between the ORA and the Corvis ST was 2.2 to 35.9 mu m. Conclusions The ORA measured the CCT up to 35.9 mu m greater than Corvis ST. Therefore, the two devices may not be used interchangeably for measuring CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:2563 / 2567
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agreement in central corneal thickness measurement between Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer
    Ramin Salouti
    Reza Razeghinejad
    Nasrin Masihpour
    Maryam Ghoreyshi
    M. Hossein Nowroozzadeh
    International Ophthalmology, 2020, 40 : 2563 - 2567
  • [2] The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis
    Fujishiro, Takashi
    Matsuura, Masato
    Fujino, Yuri
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Tokumo, Kana
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Asaoka, Ryo
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2020, 29 (06) : 479 - 484
  • [3] Measurement of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Diabetes Mellitus Using the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST
    Ramm, Lisa
    Herber, Robert
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Terai, Naim
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (05) : 595 - 599
  • [4] Investigation of corneal biomechanics using Ocular Response Analyzer® and Corvis® ST in diabetes mellitus
    Ramm, Lisa
    Herber, Robert
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    Terai, Naim
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [5] Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis
    Matsuura, Masato
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Fujino, Yuri
    Yanagisawa, Mieko
    Nakao, Yoshitaka
    Tokumo, Kana
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Asaoka, Ryo
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 104 (04) : 563 - 568
  • [6] Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness
    Wasielica-Poslednik, Joanna
    Berisha, Fatmire
    Aliyeva, Shakhsanam
    Pfeiffer, Norbert
    Hoffmann, Esther M.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 248 (11) : 1617 - 1622
  • [7] Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness
    Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik
    Fatmire Berisha
    Shakhsanam Aliyeva
    Norbert Pfeiffer
    Esther M. Hoffmann
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2010, 248 : 1617 - 1622
  • [8] The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Eyes with Glaucoma
    Matsuura, Masato
    Hirasawa, Kazunori
    Murata, Hiroshi
    Yanagisawa, Mieko
    Nakao, Yoshitaka
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Asaoka, Ryo
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [9] Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST
    Ramm, Lisa
    Herber, Robert
    Spoerl, Eberhard
    Raiskup, Frederik
    Pillunat, Lutz E.
    Terai, Naim
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 2019
  • [10] Intraocular Pressure Before and After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Comparison of Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer
    Salouti, Ramin
    Azimi, Ali
    Meshksar, Aidin
    Takapouy, Ramin
    Ghoreyshi, Maryam
    Salouti, Kia
    Razeghinejad, Reza
    Nowroozzadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2024, 33 (10) : 780 - 784