MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Alabousi, Mostafa [1 ]
McInnes, Matthew D. F. [2 ,3 ]
Salameh, Jean-Paul [4 ]
Satkunasingham, Janakan [5 ,6 ]
Kagoma, Yoan K. [5 ,6 ]
Ruo, Leyo [6 ,7 ]
Meyers, Brandon M. [6 ,8 ]
Aziz, Tariq [6 ,9 ]
van der Pol, Christian B. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol & Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; multidetector computed tomography; pancreatic neoplasms; systematic review; meta-analysis; ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27056
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The detection of liver metastases is important for pancreatic cancer curative treatment eligibility. The data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer liver metastases. However, MRI is not currently recommended in multiple published guidelines. Purpose To perform a comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CT and MRI for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection. Study Type Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and multiple radiology society meeting archives were searched until November 2018. Comparative design studies reporting on liver CT and MRI accuracy for detection of pancreatic cancer liver metastases in the same cohort were included. Field Strength 1.5T or 3.0T. Assessment Demographic, methodologic, and diagnostic test accuracy data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. Statistical Tests Accuracy metrics were obtained using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of different covariates on accuracy estimates was assessed using a meta-regression model. Covariates included modality, study design, tumor characteristics, risk of bias, and imaging protocols. Results Fourteen studies including 987 patients with pancreatic cancer (205 with liver metastases) were included. Sensitivity for CT and MRI was 45% (confidence intervals [95% CI] 21-71%) and 83% (95% CI 74-88%), respectively. Specificity for CT and MRI was 94% (95% CI 84-98%) and 96% (95% CI 93-97%), respectively. The greater observed sensitivity of MRI was preserved in the meta-regression model (P = 0.01), while no difference in specificity was detected (P = 0.16). CT sensitivity was highest for triphasic and quadriphasic examinations compared to single phase or biphasic protocols (P = 0.03). Most studies were at high risk of bias. Data Conclusion MRI is more sensitive than CT for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection, accounting for confounding variables. Consideration of this finding in clinical practice guidelines is recommended. Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 48
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy for the Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
    Abialmouna, Omar
    Kalot, Mohamad
    Hamade, Mohamad
    Bahuva, Ronak
    Hasmi, Ariba
    Ahmed, Aamir
    Brumberger, Zachary
    Troy, Jordan
    Choaib, Ali
    Bharucha, Ronak
    Moyer, Ross
    Provost, Karin
    Page, Brian
    Sharma, Umesh
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 74 : 2436 - 2438
  • [42] Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Yeun-Yoon Kim
    Sunyoung Lee
    Jaeseung Shin
    Won Jeong Son
    Yun Ho Roh
    Jeong Ah Hwang
    Ji Eun Lee
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 6723 - 6729
  • [43] SURGICAL VS. ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYSTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Farias, Galileu F.
    Visconti, Thiago A.
    Tranquillini Goncalves, Caio V.
    Guedes, Hugo G.
    Martins, Rafael K.
    Moura, Eduardo T.
    Matuguma, Sergio E.
    dos Santos, Marcos E.
    Souza, Thiago F.
    de Moura, Eduardo G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB580 - AB581
  • [44] Deep Learning for Detection of Periapical Radiolucent Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Sadr, Soroush
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Motamedian, Saeed Reza
    Motie, Parisa
    Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
    Dianat, Omid
    Nosrat, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2023, 49 (03) : 248 - 261.e3
  • [45] Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Zha, Nanxi
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Sharifabadi, Anahita Dehmoobad
    Pozdnyakov, Alex
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Freitas, Vivianne
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 2058 - 2071
  • [46] MRI detection of suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vineet Vijay Gorolay
    Naomi Natasha Niles
    Ya Ruth Huo
    Navid Ahmadi
    Kate Hanneman
    Elizabeth Thompson
    Michael Vinchill Chan
    Neuroradiology, 2022, 64 : 1471 - 1481
  • [47] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Deep Learning Detection of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
    Cao, Yuzhu
    Nguchu, Benedictor Alexander
    Monkam, Patrice
    Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa
    Sun, Haotian
    Zheng, Jian
    Yang, Xiaodong
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1507 - 1523
  • [48] Artificial intelligence in commercial fracture detection products: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Husarek, Julius
    Hess, Silvan
    Razaeian, Sam
    Ruder, Thomas D.
    Sehmisch, Stephan
    Mueller, Martin
    Liodakis, Emmanouil
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [49] Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mostafa Alabousi
    Nanxi Zha
    Jean-Paul Salameh
    Lucy Samoilov
    Anahita Dehmoobad Sharifabadi
    Alex Pozdnyakov
    Behnam Sadeghirad
    Vivianne Freitas
    Matthew D. F. McInnes
    Abdullah Alabousi
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 2058 - 2071
  • [50] MRI detection of suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gorolay, Vineet Vijay
    Niles, Naomi Natasha
    Huo, Ya Ruth
    Ahmadi, Navid
    Hanneman, Kate
    Thompson, Elizabeth
    Chan, Michael Vinchill
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2022, 64 (08) : 1471 - 1481