MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Alabousi, Mostafa [1 ]
McInnes, Matthew D. F. [2 ,3 ]
Salameh, Jean-Paul [4 ]
Satkunasingham, Janakan [5 ,6 ]
Kagoma, Yoan K. [5 ,6 ]
Ruo, Leyo [6 ,7 ]
Meyers, Brandon M. [6 ,8 ]
Aziz, Tariq [6 ,9 ]
van der Pol, Christian B. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol & Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; multidetector computed tomography; pancreatic neoplasms; systematic review; meta-analysis; ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27056
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The detection of liver metastases is important for pancreatic cancer curative treatment eligibility. The data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer liver metastases. However, MRI is not currently recommended in multiple published guidelines. Purpose To perform a comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CT and MRI for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection. Study Type Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and multiple radiology society meeting archives were searched until November 2018. Comparative design studies reporting on liver CT and MRI accuracy for detection of pancreatic cancer liver metastases in the same cohort were included. Field Strength 1.5T or 3.0T. Assessment Demographic, methodologic, and diagnostic test accuracy data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. Statistical Tests Accuracy metrics were obtained using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of different covariates on accuracy estimates was assessed using a meta-regression model. Covariates included modality, study design, tumor characteristics, risk of bias, and imaging protocols. Results Fourteen studies including 987 patients with pancreatic cancer (205 with liver metastases) were included. Sensitivity for CT and MRI was 45% (confidence intervals [95% CI] 21-71%) and 83% (95% CI 74-88%), respectively. Specificity for CT and MRI was 94% (95% CI 84-98%) and 96% (95% CI 93-97%), respectively. The greater observed sensitivity of MRI was preserved in the meta-regression model (P = 0.01), while no difference in specificity was detected (P = 0.16). CT sensitivity was highest for triphasic and quadriphasic examinations compared to single phase or biphasic protocols (P = 0.03). Most studies were at high risk of bias. Data Conclusion MRI is more sensitive than CT for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection, accounting for confounding variables. Consideration of this finding in clinical practice guidelines is recommended. Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 48
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Living vs. deceased donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grant, Robert C.
    Sandhu, Lakhbir
    Dixon, Peter R.
    Greig, Paul D.
    Grant, David R.
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (01) : 140 - 147
  • [32] Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS for MRI and CT detection of HCC: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Guo, Yuan
    Lai, Lisha
    Jiang, Xinqing
    Wei, Xinhua
    Wu, Hongzhen
    Wang, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 134
  • [33] Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of MiRNAs in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hasani, Fatemeh
    Masrour, Mahdi
    Khamaki, Sina
    Jazi, Kimia
    Hosseini, Saba
    Heidarpour, Hadiseh
    Namazee, Mehrad
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 29 (02)
  • [34] Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Solid Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Frank, Robert A.
    Dawit, Haben
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Leeflang, Mariska
    Flood, Trevor A.
    Breau, Rodney H.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Schieda, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (04) : 1172 - 1184
  • [35] Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for the Detection of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wilson, Mitchell P.
    Katlariwala, Prayash
    Low, Gavin
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Jacques, Line
    Jack, Andrew S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 217 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [36] Surgery vs. Observation for Liver Hemangioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tuxun, Tuerhongjiang
    Apaer, Shadike
    Zhou, Cheg-Ming
    Zhang, Jin-hui
    Zhao, Jin-ming
    Tai, Qin-wen
    Cao, Jun
    Li, Tao
    Kevin, Viraswami
    Wen, Hao
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 61 (136) : 2377 - 2382
  • [37] Tourniquet Test for Dengue Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    Reid, Hamish
    Thomas, Emma
    Foster, Charlie
    Darton, Thomas C.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2016, 10 (08):
  • [38] Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sorgaard, Mathias Holm
    Kofoed, Klaus Fuglsang
    Linde, Jesper James
    George, Richard Thomas
    Rochitte, Carlos Eduardo
    Feuchtner, Gudrun
    Lima, Joao A. C.
    Abdulla, Jawdat
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 10 (06) : 450 - 457
  • [39] Diagnostic performance of CT versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category 5 for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Kim, Yeun-Yoon
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Son, Won Jeong
    Roh, Yun Ho
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Lee, Ji Eun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 6723 - 6729
  • [40] Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for sarcopenia diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fu, Hongbo
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Wenyi
    Lu, Jing
    Yang, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2023, 14 : 57 - 70