MRI vs. CT for the Detection of Liver Metastases in Patients With Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Comparative Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:31
|
作者
Alabousi, Mostafa [1 ]
McInnes, Matthew D. F. [2 ,3 ]
Salameh, Jean-Paul [4 ]
Satkunasingham, Janakan [5 ,6 ]
Kagoma, Yoan K. [5 ,6 ]
Ruo, Leyo [6 ,7 ]
Meyers, Brandon M. [6 ,8 ]
Aziz, Tariq [6 ,9 ]
van der Pol, Christian B. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Radiol & Epidemiol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] McMaster Univ, Juravinski Hosp, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; multidetector computed tomography; pancreatic neoplasms; systematic review; meta-analysis; ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.27056
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background The detection of liver metastases is important for pancreatic cancer curative treatment eligibility. The data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer liver metastases. However, MRI is not currently recommended in multiple published guidelines. Purpose To perform a comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CT and MRI for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection. Study Type Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and multiple radiology society meeting archives were searched until November 2018. Comparative design studies reporting on liver CT and MRI accuracy for detection of pancreatic cancer liver metastases in the same cohort were included. Field Strength 1.5T or 3.0T. Assessment Demographic, methodologic, and diagnostic test accuracy data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. Statistical Tests Accuracy metrics were obtained using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. The impact of different covariates on accuracy estimates was assessed using a meta-regression model. Covariates included modality, study design, tumor characteristics, risk of bias, and imaging protocols. Results Fourteen studies including 987 patients with pancreatic cancer (205 with liver metastases) were included. Sensitivity for CT and MRI was 45% (confidence intervals [95% CI] 21-71%) and 83% (95% CI 74-88%), respectively. Specificity for CT and MRI was 94% (95% CI 84-98%) and 96% (95% CI 93-97%), respectively. The greater observed sensitivity of MRI was preserved in the meta-regression model (P = 0.01), while no difference in specificity was detected (P = 0.16). CT sensitivity was highest for triphasic and quadriphasic examinations compared to single phase or biphasic protocols (P = 0.03). Most studies were at high risk of bias. Data Conclusion MRI is more sensitive than CT for pancreatic cancer liver metastases detection, accounting for confounding variables. Consideration of this finding in clinical practice guidelines is recommended. Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 48
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Percentage of Pancreatic Cysts on MRI With a Pancreatic Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elmi, Nika
    Mcevoy, David
    Mcinnes, Matthew D. F.
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    Luk, Lyndon
    Asghar, Sunna
    Jajodia, Ankush
    de Carvalho, Tiago Lins
    Warnica, William J.
    Zha, Nanxi
    Ullah, Sadaf
    van Der Pol, Christian B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (03) : 1063 - 1075
  • [22] Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Pancreatic Necrosectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Karagiannidis, Georgios
    Labinoti, Roland
    Sinclair, Martin
    BJS-BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 112 : 13 - 13
  • [23] MRI and SPECT/CT demonstrate, with low certainty of evidence, the highest diagnostic accuracy for aseptic knee arthroplasty loosening: A systematic comparative diagnostic test review and meta-analysis
    Buijs, George S.
    Kooijenga, Anne C.
    Rikken, Quinten G. H.
    Schafroth, Matthias U.
    Kievit, Arthur J.
    Blankevoort, Leendert
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2024, 32 (08) : 2061 - 2074
  • [24] Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Fibrotouch and Fibroscan in Assessing Liver Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chaudhary, Muhammad Y. N.
    Jawwad, Mohammad
    Ismail, Muhammad
    Chaudhary, Muhammad H. N.
    Asghar, Adam
    Ahmed, Syed Arsalan
    Hasan, Fariha
    Akram, Abdullah
    Riaz, Monazza
    Arham, Abdul
    Rajamanuri, Medha
    Naveed, Umna
    Serrano, Oluwagbenga
    Basit, Syed Abdul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S1456 - S1457
  • [25] The clock drawing test: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy
    Park, JinKyung
    Jeong, EunHye
    Seomun, GyeongAe
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (12) : 2742 - 2754
  • [26] Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound, CT and MRI in Budd Chiari syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gupta, Pankaj
    Bansal, Varun
    Kumar-M, Praveen
    Sinha, Saroj K.
    Samanta, Jayanta
    Mandavdhare, Harshal
    Sharma, Vishal
    Dutta, Usha
    Kochhar, Rakesh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1109):
  • [27] Accuracy of Non-Contrast MRI for the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Liping
    Pan, Xuming
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 38 (03) : 743 - 750
  • [28] Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Esophageal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Sangjune Laurence
    Yadav, Poonam
    Starekova, Jitka
    Christensen, Leslie
    Chandereng, Thevaa
    Chappell, Richard
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Bassetti, Michael F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (03) : 583 - 594
  • [29] Response to: Comment on "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of miRNAs in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer"
    Sun, Xiao
    Zhou, Xiaobin
    Liu, Haihua
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2019, 2019
  • [30] Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared to CT and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Udare, Amar
    Agarwal, Minu
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    McInnes, Matthew
    Rubino, Julian G.
    Marcaccio, Michael
    van der Pol, Christian B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (04) : 1126 - 1137