Is there an ideal morphine dose for prehospital treatment of severe acute pain?: A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 doses

被引:41
|
作者
Bounes, Vincent [1 ]
Charpentier, Sandrine [1 ]
Houze-Cerfon, Charles-Henri [1 ]
Bellard, Cedric [1 ]
Ducasse, Jean Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ, Pole Med Durgences, SAMU 31, F-31059 Toulouse 9, France
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We aimed to determine the best intravenous morphine titration protocol by comparing 2 protocols for prehospital treatment of patients with severe acute pain. Methods: Eligible patients with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 60/100 or higher were randomly allocated to receive either 0.05 mg/kg morphine then 0.025 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group A) or 0.1 mg/kg morphine then 0.05 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group B) intravenously. The protocol-defined primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with pain relief (with a NRS score of 30/100 or lower) 30 minutes after the first injection. Results: A total of 106 consecutive patients were randomized. Thirty minutes after the injection, 66% of the patients in group A had an NRS of 30 or lower vs 76% of those in group B (P = .25). Ten minutes after the injection, 17% of the patients in group A had an NRS score of 30 or lower vs 40% of those in group B, (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.8; P < .01). Patients in group B were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia. In addition, there were no serious complications in either group. However, patients in group B did experience almost twice the incidence of adverse effects overall and in particular 4 times the level of emesis, although neither of these observations were statistically significant. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, only an initial NRS score of 100 was an independent predictive factor for failure of analgesia (odds ratio, 0.125; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.68; P < .05). Conclusion: The high-dose morphine regimen showed a similar analgesic response pattern to the low-dose one in severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Patients in the high-dose group were more likely to experience pain relief 10 minutes after the injection. In the interests of achieving rapid pain relief, an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg should no longer be recommended for treating severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Another important message arising from our study is that a regimented dose of morphine, with an initial dose and strictly administered lower doses at regular intervals, is safe in the prehospital setting. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DOUBLE-BLIND PARALLEL COMPARISON OF SINGLE ORAL DOSES OF KETOPROFEN, CODEINE, AND PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE DENTAL PAIN
    MEHLISCH, D
    FRAKES, L
    CAVALIERE, MB
    GELMAN, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 24 (11-1): : 486 - 492
  • [42] INTRAVENOUS DEZOCINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON WITH MORPHINE
    PANDIT, UA
    KOTHARY, SP
    PANDIT, SK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1986, 26 (04): : 275 - 280
  • [43] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF PARENTERAL MORPHINE, PLACEBO, AND ORAL FENOPROFEN IN MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    DAVIE, IT
    SLAWSON, KB
    BURT, RAP
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1982, 61 (12): : 1002 - 1005
  • [44] DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF DEZOCINE AND MORPHINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF
    PANDIT, SK
    KOTHARY, SP
    PANDIT, UA
    KUNZ, NR
    CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1985, 32 (06) : 583 - 591
  • [45] Double-blind randomized trial of tramadol for the treatment of the pain of diabetic neuropathy
    Harati, Y
    Gooch, C
    Swenson, M
    Edelman, S
    Greene, D
    Raskin, P
    Donofrio, P
    Cornblath, D
    Sachdeo, R
    Siu, CO
    Kamin, M
    NEUROLOGY, 1998, 50 (06) : 1842 - 1846
  • [46] Double-blind randomized trial of bupropion SR for the treatment of neuropathic pain
    Semenchuk, MR
    Sherman, SJ
    Davis, BE
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (08) : A204 - A204
  • [47] Double-blind, randomized trial of bupropion SR for the treatment of neuropathic pain
    Semenchuk, MR
    Sherman, S
    Davis, B
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 57 (09) : 1583 - 1588
  • [48] High-dose vitamin D3 in the treatment of severe acute malnutrition: a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Saleem, Javeria
    Zakar, Rubeena
    Zakar, Muhammad Z.
    Belay, Mulugeta
    Rowe, Marion
    Timms, Peter M.
    Scragg, Robert
    Martineau, Adrian R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 107 (05): : 725 - 733
  • [49] THERAPY FOR NON-GONOCOCCAL URETHRITIS - DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF 2 DOSES AND 2 DURATIONS OF MINOCYCLINE
    BOWIE, WR
    ALEXANDER, R
    STIMSON, JB
    FLOYD, JF
    HOLMES, KK
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1981, 95 (03) : 306 - 311
  • [50] Comparison between Two Low Doses of Amitriptyline in the Management of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Study
    Mahmoud, Atef Mohamed Sayed
    Ragab, Safaa Gaber
    Boules, Maged Labib
    Botros, Joseph Makram
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 2021