Is there an ideal morphine dose for prehospital treatment of severe acute pain?: A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 doses

被引:41
|
作者
Bounes, Vincent [1 ]
Charpentier, Sandrine [1 ]
Houze-Cerfon, Charles-Henri [1 ]
Bellard, Cedric [1 ]
Ducasse, Jean Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ, Pole Med Durgences, SAMU 31, F-31059 Toulouse 9, France
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We aimed to determine the best intravenous morphine titration protocol by comparing 2 protocols for prehospital treatment of patients with severe acute pain. Methods: Eligible patients with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 60/100 or higher were randomly allocated to receive either 0.05 mg/kg morphine then 0.025 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group A) or 0.1 mg/kg morphine then 0.05 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group B) intravenously. The protocol-defined primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with pain relief (with a NRS score of 30/100 or lower) 30 minutes after the first injection. Results: A total of 106 consecutive patients were randomized. Thirty minutes after the injection, 66% of the patients in group A had an NRS of 30 or lower vs 76% of those in group B (P = .25). Ten minutes after the injection, 17% of the patients in group A had an NRS score of 30 or lower vs 40% of those in group B, (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.8; P < .01). Patients in group B were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia. In addition, there were no serious complications in either group. However, patients in group B did experience almost twice the incidence of adverse effects overall and in particular 4 times the level of emesis, although neither of these observations were statistically significant. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, only an initial NRS score of 100 was an independent predictive factor for failure of analgesia (odds ratio, 0.125; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.68; P < .05). Conclusion: The high-dose morphine regimen showed a similar analgesic response pattern to the low-dose one in severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Patients in the high-dose group were more likely to experience pain relief 10 minutes after the injection. In the interests of achieving rapid pain relief, an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg should no longer be recommended for treating severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Another important message arising from our study is that a regimented dose of morphine, with an initial dose and strictly administered lower doses at regular intervals, is safe in the prehospital setting. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low dose of morphine to relieve dyspnea in acute respiratory failure: the OpiDys double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Deleris, Robin
    Bureau, Come
    Lebbah, Said
    Decavele, Maxens
    Dres, Martin
    Mayaux, Julien
    Similowski, Thomas
    Dechartres, Agnes
    Demoule, Alexandre
    RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [22] A randomized, double-blind comparison of OROS® hydromorphone and controlled-release morphine for the control of chronic cancer pain
    Hanna M.
    Thipphawong J.
    BMC Palliative Care, 7 (1)
  • [23] Comparison of topical capsaicin and topical piroxicam in the treatment of acute trauma-induced pain: A randomized double-blind trial
    Kocak, Abdullah Osman
    Dogruyol, Sinem
    Akbas, Ilker
    Menekse, Tugba Sanalp
    Gur, Sultan Tuna Akgol
    Kocak, Meryem Betos
    Cekmen, Bora
    Orun, Serhat
    Cakir, Zeynep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (09): : 1767 - 1771
  • [24] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF 2 LORMETAZEPAM DOSES IN ELDERLY INSOMNIACS
    RICHARDS, HH
    VALLEJONES, CJ
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1988, 11 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [25] BUPRENORPHINE AND MORPHINE EFFICACY IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - A DOUBLE-BLIND MULTIPLE-DOSE STUDY
    OUELLETTE, RD
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 22 (04): : 165 - 172
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Subcutaneous Diclofenac in the Management of Acute Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
    Dietrich, Thomas
    Leeson, Rachel
    Gugliotta, Barbara
    Petersen, Birte
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2014, 14 (04) : 315 - 323
  • [27] A randomized double-blind comparison of two single doses of mifepristone for emergency contraception
    Xiao, BL
    von Hertzen, H
    Zhao, H
    Piaggio, G
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (12) : 3084 - 3089
  • [28] Procain infusion in pain treatment of acute pancreatitis: a randomized, placebo controlled double-blind trial
    Wilms, B.
    Meffert, K. S.
    Schultes, B.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (46) : 2290 - 2295
  • [29] Effect of modafinil on acute pain: A randomized double-blind crossover study
    Taneja, I
    Bruehl, S
    Robertson, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 44 (12): : 1425 - 1427
  • [30] THE USE OF KETAMINE FOR ACUTE TREATMENT OF PAIN: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Sin, Billy
    Tatunchak, Tamara
    Paryavi, Mohammad
    Olivo, Maria
    Mian, Usman
    Ruiz, Josel
    Shah, Bupendra
    de Souza, Sylvie
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (05): : 601 - 608