Is there an ideal morphine dose for prehospital treatment of severe acute pain?: A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 doses

被引:41
|
作者
Bounes, Vincent [1 ]
Charpentier, Sandrine [1 ]
Houze-Cerfon, Charles-Henri [1 ]
Bellard, Cedric [1 ]
Ducasse, Jean Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ, Pole Med Durgences, SAMU 31, F-31059 Toulouse 9, France
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We aimed to determine the best intravenous morphine titration protocol by comparing 2 protocols for prehospital treatment of patients with severe acute pain. Methods: Eligible patients with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 60/100 or higher were randomly allocated to receive either 0.05 mg/kg morphine then 0.025 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group A) or 0.1 mg/kg morphine then 0.05 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group B) intravenously. The protocol-defined primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with pain relief (with a NRS score of 30/100 or lower) 30 minutes after the first injection. Results: A total of 106 consecutive patients were randomized. Thirty minutes after the injection, 66% of the patients in group A had an NRS of 30 or lower vs 76% of those in group B (P = .25). Ten minutes after the injection, 17% of the patients in group A had an NRS score of 30 or lower vs 40% of those in group B, (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.8; P < .01). Patients in group B were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia. In addition, there were no serious complications in either group. However, patients in group B did experience almost twice the incidence of adverse effects overall and in particular 4 times the level of emesis, although neither of these observations were statistically significant. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, only an initial NRS score of 100 was an independent predictive factor for failure of analgesia (odds ratio, 0.125; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.68; P < .05). Conclusion: The high-dose morphine regimen showed a similar analgesic response pattern to the low-dose one in severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Patients in the high-dose group were more likely to experience pain relief 10 minutes after the injection. In the interests of achieving rapid pain relief, an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg should no longer be recommended for treating severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Another important message arising from our study is that a regimented dose of morphine, with an initial dose and strictly administered lower doses at regular intervals, is safe in the prehospital setting. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prehospital Analgesia With Intranasal Ketamine (PAIN-K): A Randomized Double-Blind Trial in Adults
    Andolfatto, Gary
    Innes, Kelsey
    Dick, William
    Jenneson, Sandra
    Willman, Elaine
    Stenstrom, Robert
    Zed, Peter J.
    Benoit, Gene
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (02) : 241 - 250
  • [32] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF DEZOCINE AND MORPHINE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE RENAL AND URETERAL COLIC
    WARREN, MM
    BOYCE, WH
    EVANS, JW
    PETERS, PC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 134 (03): : 457 - 459
  • [33] BUTORPHANOL, A NEW INTRAVENOUS ANALGESIC - DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON WITH MORPHINE SULFATE IN POSTOPERATIVE-PATIENTS WITH MODERATE OR SEVERE PAIN
    DELPIZZO, A
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1976, 20 (03): : 221 - 232
  • [34] A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled dose comparison of thalidomide for treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum
    Villahermosa, LG
    Fajardo, TT
    Abalos, RM
    Balagon, MV
    Tan, EV
    Cellona, RV
    Palmer, JP
    Wittes, J
    Thomas, SD
    Kook, KA
    Walsh, GP
    Walsh, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2005, 72 (05): : 518 - 526
  • [35] DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SINGLE DOSES OF MEPTAZINOL AS A SUPPOSITORY AND MORPHINE BY IM INJECTION
    MOORES, MA
    FRATER, R
    PARRY, P
    HANNING, CD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (05) : 542 - 546
  • [36] Low dose of morphine to relieve dyspnea in acute respiratory failure (OpiDys): protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled study
    Demoule, Alexandre
    Deleris, Robin
    Bureau, Come
    Lebbah, Said
    Decavele, Maxens
    Dres, Martin
    Similowski, Thomas
    Dechartres, Agnes
    TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [37] Low dose of morphine to relieve dyspnea in acute respiratory failure (OpiDys): protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled study
    Alexandre Demoule
    Robin Deleris
    Côme Bureau
    Said Lebbah
    Maxens Decavèle
    Martin Dres
    Thomas Similowski
    Agnes Dechartres
    Trials, 23
  • [38] DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY WITH 3 DIFFERENT DOSES OF CINARIZINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF VERTIGO
    GANANCA, MM
    CAOVILLA, HH
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA, 1990, 47 (10) : 524 - 528
  • [39] Comparison of the effects of magnesium and ketamine on postoperative pain and morphine consumption. A double-blind randomized controlled clinical study
    Arikan, Muge
    Aslan, Bilge
    Arikan, Osman
    Horasanli, Eyup
    But, Abdulkadir
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 31 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [40] A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL FENTANYL INFUSION VERSUS PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH MORPHINE FOR POSTTHORACOTOMY PAIN
    BENZON, HT
    WONG, HY
    BELAVIC, AM
    GOODMAN, I
    MITCHELL, D
    LEFHEIT, T
    LOCICERO, J
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1993, 76 (02): : 316 - 322