Is there an ideal morphine dose for prehospital treatment of severe acute pain?: A randomized, double-blind comparison of 2 doses

被引:41
|
作者
Bounes, Vincent [1 ]
Charpentier, Sandrine [1 ]
Houze-Cerfon, Charles-Henri [1 ]
Bellard, Cedric [1 ]
Ducasse, Jean Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ, Pole Med Durgences, SAMU 31, F-31059 Toulouse 9, France
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2007.04.020
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We aimed to determine the best intravenous morphine titration protocol by comparing 2 protocols for prehospital treatment of patients with severe acute pain. Methods: Eligible patients with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 60/100 or higher were randomly allocated to receive either 0.05 mg/kg morphine then 0.025 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group A) or 0.1 mg/kg morphine then 0.05 mg/kg every 5 minutes (group B) intravenously. The protocol-defined primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with pain relief (with a NRS score of 30/100 or lower) 30 minutes after the first injection. Results: A total of 106 consecutive patients were randomized. Thirty minutes after the injection, 66% of the patients in group A had an NRS of 30 or lower vs 76% of those in group B (P = .25). Ten minutes after the injection, 17% of the patients in group A had an NRS score of 30 or lower vs 40% of those in group B, (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-8.8; P < .01). Patients in group B were significantly more satisfied with their analgesia. In addition, there were no serious complications in either group. However, patients in group B did experience almost twice the incidence of adverse effects overall and in particular 4 times the level of emesis, although neither of these observations were statistically significant. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, only an initial NRS score of 100 was an independent predictive factor for failure of analgesia (odds ratio, 0.125; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.68; P < .05). Conclusion: The high-dose morphine regimen showed a similar analgesic response pattern to the low-dose one in severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Patients in the high-dose group were more likely to experience pain relief 10 minutes after the injection. In the interests of achieving rapid pain relief, an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg should no longer be recommended for treating severe acute pain in a prehospital setting. Another important message arising from our study is that a regimented dose of morphine, with an initial dose and strictly administered lower doses at regular intervals, is safe in the prehospital setting. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 154
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF MULTIPLE INTRAMUSCULAR DOSES OF CIRAMADOL, MORPHINE, AND PLACEBO FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    POWELL, WF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1985, 64 (11): : 1101 - 1107
  • [2] DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTIPLE-DOSE COMPARISON OF BUPRENORPHINE AND MORPHINE IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    TIGERSTEDT, I
    TAMMISTO, T
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 24 (06) : 462 - 468
  • [3] A randomized, double-blind study comparing morphine with fentanyl in prehospital analgesia
    Galinski, M
    Dolveck, F
    Borron, SW
    Tual, L
    Van Laer, V
    Lardeur, JY
    Lapostolle, F
    Adnet, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (02): : 114 - 119
  • [4] DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTIPLE-DOSE COMPARISON OF BUPRENORPHINE AND MORPHINE IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN OF CHILDREN
    MAUNUKSELA, EL
    KORPELA, R
    OLKKOLA, KT
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [5] Comparison of two doses of ketoprofen to treat pain: a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial
    Riou, Bruno
    Plaisance, Patrick
    Lecomte, Francois
    Soulat, Louis
    Orcel, Philippe
    Mazoit, Jean-Xavier
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety Profile of a Single Dose of Hydromorphone Compared with Morphine in Older Adults with Acute, Severe Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Baccelieri, Angelo
    Gallagher, E. John
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 7 (01): : 1 - 10
  • [7] CEFUROXIME IN SEVERE RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS - DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF 2 DOSES
    PINES, A
    RAAFAT, H
    MULLINGER, BM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF THE CHEST, 1979, 73 (04): : 395 - 398
  • [9] Intranasal sufentanil versus intravenous morphine for acute severe trauma pain: A double-blind randomized non-inferiority study
    Blancher, Marc
    Maignan, Maxime
    Clape, Cyrielle
    Quesada, Jean-Louis
    Collomb-Muret, Roselyne
    Albasini, Francois
    Ageron, Francois-Xavier
    Fey, Stephanie
    Wuyts, Audrey
    Banihachemi, Jean-Jacques
    Bertrand, Barthelemy
    Lehmann, Audrey
    Bollart, Claire
    Debaty, Guillaume
    Briot, Raphael
    Viglino, Damien
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (07)
  • [10] DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY WITH PIRITRAMIDE AND MORPHINE IN TREATMENT OF POSSTOPERATIVE PAIN
    KAY, B
    ANAESTHESIST, 1971, 20 (11): : 445 - &