3D versus 2D domain wall interaction in ideal and rough nanowires

被引:3
|
作者
Pivano, A. [1 ,2 ]
Dolocan, Voicu O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
[2] CNRS, IM2NP, F-13397 Marseille, France
关键词
Domain walls; Ferromagnetic nanowites; Micromagnetism;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.083
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The interaction between transverse magnetic domain walls (TDWs) in planar (2D) and cylindrical (3D) nanowires is examined using micromagneLic simulations. We show that in perfect and surface deformed wires the free TDWs behave differently, as the 3D TDWs combine into metastable stares with average lifetimes of 300 ns depending on roughness, while the 2D TDWs do not due to 2D shape anisotropy. When the 2D and 3D TDWs are pinned at artificial constrictions, they behave similarly as they interact mainly through the dipolar field. This magnetostatic interaction is well described by the point charge model with multipole expansion. In surface deformed wires with artificial constrictions, the interaction becomes more complex as the depinning held decreases and dynamical pinning can lead to local resonances. This can strongly influence the control of TDWs in DW-based devices. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map
    Antti Oulasvirta
    Sara Estlander
    Antti Nurminen
    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2009, 13 : 303 - 320
  • [2] Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map
    Oulasvirta, Antti
    Estlander, Sara
    Nurminen, A.
    PERSONAL AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2009, 13 (04) : 303 - 320
  • [3] Multimodal interaction for 2D and 3D environments
    Cohen, P
    McGee, D
    Oviatt, S
    Wu, LZ
    Clow, J
    King, R
    Julier, S
    Rosenblum, L
    IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 19 (04) : 10 - 13
  • [4] 2D and 3D ordered arrays of Co magnetic nanowires
    Garcia, J.
    Prida, V. M.
    Vega, V.
    Rosa, W. O.
    Caballero-Flores, R.
    Iglesias, L.
    Hernando, B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2015, 383 : 88 - 93
  • [5] 3D versus 2D/3D shape descriptors:: A comparative study
    Zaharia, T
    Prêteux, F
    IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS III, 2004, 5298 : 47 - 58
  • [6] Domain wall pinning and interaction in rough cylindrical nanowires
    Dolocan, Voicu O.
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2014, 105 (16)
  • [7] The Mona Lisa effect: 2D versus 3D
    Boyarskaya, E.
    Hecht, H.
    PERCEPTION, 2010, 39 : 176 - 176
  • [8] 2D versus 3D aviation weather visualisations
    Sarbach, Adrian
    Kwok, Tiffany C. K.
    Kiefer, Peter
    Raubal, Martin
    ERGONOMICS, 2025,
  • [9] SKETCHING 3D MODELS WITH 2D INTERACTION DEVICES
    BRANCO, V
    COSTA, A
    FERREIRA, FN
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 1994, 13 (03) : C489 - C502
  • [10] AirMouse: Finger Gesture for 2D and 3D Interaction
    Ortega, Michael
    Nigay, Laurence
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT 2009, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5727 : 214 - 227