3D versus 2D domain wall interaction in ideal and rough nanowires

被引:3
|
作者
Pivano, A. [1 ,2 ]
Dolocan, Voicu O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
[2] CNRS, IM2NP, F-13397 Marseille, France
关键词
Domain walls; Ferromagnetic nanowites; Micromagnetism;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.083
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The interaction between transverse magnetic domain walls (TDWs) in planar (2D) and cylindrical (3D) nanowires is examined using micromagneLic simulations. We show that in perfect and surface deformed wires the free TDWs behave differently, as the 3D TDWs combine into metastable stares with average lifetimes of 300 ns depending on roughness, while the 2D TDWs do not due to 2D shape anisotropy. When the 2D and 3D TDWs are pinned at artificial constrictions, they behave similarly as they interact mainly through the dipolar field. This magnetostatic interaction is well described by the point charge model with multipole expansion. In surface deformed wires with artificial constrictions, the interaction becomes more complex as the depinning held decreases and dynamical pinning can lead to local resonances. This can strongly influence the control of TDWs in DW-based devices. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 2D versus 3D quantitation of tumour response to treatment
    Hopper, KD
    Kasales, CJ
    Eggli, KD
    Belman, NM
    Potok, PS
    TenHave, TR
    Umlauf, MJ
    VanSlyke, MA
    Olt, GJ
    Close, P
    Lipton, A
    Harvey, HA
    Hartzell, JS
    Go, BDM
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN ONCOLOGY: 19TH L H GRAY CONFERENCE, 1996, : 50 - 51
  • [22] 2D versus 3D colour space face detection
    Kovac, J
    Peer, P
    Solina, F
    PROCEEDINGS EC-VIP-MC 2003, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 449 - 454
  • [23] 2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty
    Ettinger, Max
    Claassen, Leif
    Paes, Peter
    Calliess, Tilman
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (01): : 149 - 151
  • [24] Tweek: Merging 2D and 3D interaction in immersive environments
    Hartling, P
    Bierbaum, AD
    Cruz-Neira, C
    6TH WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL VI, PROCEEDINGS: INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS AND ENGINEERING I, 2002, : 1 - 5
  • [25] User experience and interaction performance in 2D/3D telecollaboration
    Anton, David
    Kurillo, Gregorij
    Bajcsy, Ruzena
    FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2018, 82 : 77 - 88
  • [26] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248
  • [27] Simulation of bootstrap current in 2D and 3D ideal magnetic fields in tokamaks
    Raghunathan, M.
    Graves, J. P.
    Cooper, W. A.
    Pedro, M.
    Sauter, O.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2016, 56 (09)
  • [28] Insights on 2D versus 3D Modeling of Strip Loading on Spatially Varying Random Soil Domain
    Singhal, Ashu
    Vikash, Gyan
    Singhai, Sanshrit
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: GEOTECHNICAL DATA ANALYSIS AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 342 : 134 - 141
  • [29] XDWM: A 2D Domain Wall Memory
    Hogue, Arifa
    Jones, Alex K.
    Bhanja, Sanjukta
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 185 - 188
  • [30] Fabrication of Scaffold-Based 3D Magnetic Nanowires for Domain Wall Applications
    Sanz-Hernandez, Dedalo
    Hamans, Ruben F.
    Osterrieth, Johannes
    Liao, Jung-Wei
    Skoric, Luka
    Fowlkes, Jason D.
    Rack, Philip D.
    Lippert, Anna
    Lee, Steven F.
    Lavrijsen, Reinoud
    Fernandez-Pacheco, Amalio
    NANOMATERIALS, 2018, 8 (07):