3D versus 2D domain wall interaction in ideal and rough nanowires

被引:3
|
作者
Pivano, A. [1 ,2 ]
Dolocan, Voicu O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
[2] CNRS, IM2NP, F-13397 Marseille, France
关键词
Domain walls; Ferromagnetic nanowites; Micromagnetism;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.083
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The interaction between transverse magnetic domain walls (TDWs) in planar (2D) and cylindrical (3D) nanowires is examined using micromagneLic simulations. We show that in perfect and surface deformed wires the free TDWs behave differently, as the 3D TDWs combine into metastable stares with average lifetimes of 300 ns depending on roughness, while the 2D TDWs do not due to 2D shape anisotropy. When the 2D and 3D TDWs are pinned at artificial constrictions, they behave similarly as they interact mainly through the dipolar field. This magnetostatic interaction is well described by the point charge model with multipole expansion. In surface deformed wires with artificial constrictions, the interaction becomes more complex as the depinning held decreases and dynamical pinning can lead to local resonances. This can strongly influence the control of TDWs in DW-based devices. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scenes in the Human Brain: Comparing 2D versus 3D Representations
    Groen, Iris I. A.
    Baker, Chris I.
    NEURON, 2019, 101 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [42] The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D culture
    Ana Sofia Pais
    Sandra Reis
    Mafalda Laranjo
    Francisco Caramelo
    Fátima Silva
    Maria Filomena Botelho
    Teresa Almeida-Santos
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 14
  • [43] Dynamic breast MRI with spiral trajectories: 3D versus 2D
    Yen, YF
    Han, KF
    Daniel, BL
    Heiss, S
    Birdwell, RL
    Herfkens, RJ
    Sawyer-Glover, AM
    Glover, GH
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 11 (04): : 351 - 359
  • [44] REDIFFERENTIATION OF HUMAN ARTICULAR CHONDROCYTES IN 2D VERSUS 3D CULTURE
    Caron, M. J.
    Emans, P. J.
    Voss, L.
    Surtel, D. A.
    Coolsen, M. M.
    van Rhijn, L. W.
    Welting, T. J.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 : S146 - S146
  • [45] Toxicity of Treatment for Anal Carcinoma: 2D versus 3D Planning
    Atrash, Fadi
    Kaidar-Person, Orit
    Billan, Salem
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (07): : 414 - 417
  • [46] 3D Versus 2D Cell Culture: Implications for Electron Microscopy
    Hess, Michael W.
    Pfaller, Kristian
    Ebner, Hannes L.
    Beer, Beate
    Hekl, Daniel
    Seppi, Thomas
    ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF MODEL SYSTEMS, 2010, 96 : 649 - 670
  • [48] Emotional arousal in 2D versus 3D virtual reality environments
    Tian, Feng
    Hua, Minlei
    Zhang, Wenrui
    Li, Yingjie
    Yang, Xiaoli
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [49] A microfluidic device for 2D to 3D and 3D to 3D cell navigation
    Shamloo, Amir
    Amirifar, Leyla
    JOURNAL OF MICROMECHANICS AND MICROENGINEERING, 2016, 26 (01)
  • [50] A comparison of the RKKY interaction for the 2D and 3D systems and thin films
    Balcerzak, Tadeusz
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2007, 310 (02) : 1651 - 1653