2D versus 3D aviation weather visualisations

被引:0
|
作者
Sarbach, Adrian [1 ]
Kwok, Tiffany C. K. [1 ,2 ]
Kiefer, Peter [1 ]
Raubal, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Cartog & Geoinformat, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Lufthansa Syst, V, Switzerland
关键词
aviation; weather map; situation awareness; user study; eye tracking; SITUATION AWARENESS; DISPLAYS;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2024.2445317
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Even though aviation takes place in three spatial dimensions, pilots today still mostly acquire weather information through static 2D weather maps, just as 50 years ago. In this article, we study whether interactive 3D weather visualisations increase weather-related situation awareness (SA) of pilots compared to conventional 2D weather maps. The results of a user study with commercial pilots (n = 24) are presented, in which the influence of perspective and vertical profile on SA, usability and recall were investigated. Our findings reveal that a 2D planar map view results in the highest SA compared to 3D weather visualisations, and, contrary to pilot preferences, an additional vertical profile does not further improve SA. The addition of a vertical profile supports weather feature recall, and reduces head-down times.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2D, 2.5D, or 3D? An Exploratory Study on Multilayer Network Visualisations in Virtual Reality
    Feyer, Stefan P.
    Pinaud, Bruno
    Kobourov, Stephen
    Brich, Nicolas
    Krone, Michael
    Kerren, Andreas
    Behrisch, Michael
    Schreiber, Falk
    Klein, Karsten
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2024, 30 (01) : 469 - 479
  • [2] 3D versus 2D/3D shape descriptors:: A comparative study
    Zaharia, T
    Prêteux, F
    IMAGE PROCESSING: ALGORITHMS AND SYSTEMS III, 2004, 5298 : 47 - 58
  • [3] The Mona Lisa effect: 2D versus 3D
    Boyarskaya, E.
    Hecht, H.
    PERCEPTION, 2010, 39 : 176 - 176
  • [4] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [5] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [6] Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map
    Antti Oulasvirta
    Sara Estlander
    Antti Nurminen
    Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2009, 13 : 303 - 320
  • [7] 2D versus 3D in the kinematic analysis of the horse at the trot
    F. Miró
    R. Santos
    J. L. Garrido-Castro
    A. M. Galisteo
    R. Medina-Carnicer
    Veterinary Research Communications, 2009, 33 : 507 - 513
  • [8] 2D versus 3D in the kinematic analysis of the horse at the trot
    Miro, F.
    Santos, R.
    Garrido-Castro, J. L.
    Galisteo, A. M.
    Medina-Carnicer, R.
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 33 (06) : 507 - 513
  • [9] Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map
    Oulasvirta, Antti
    Estlander, Sara
    Nurminen, A.
    PERSONAL AND UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING, 2009, 13 (04) : 303 - 320
  • [10] The challenge of ovarian tissue culture: 2D versus 3D
    Almeid Santos, A. T.
    Pais, A. S.
    Reis, S.
    Laranjo, M.
    Caramelo, F.
    Silva, F.
    Botelho, F.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 341 - 342