Photon uncertainty solves the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

被引:2
|
作者
Tommasini, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Fis Aplicada, Area Fis Teor, Orense 32004, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1134/1.1576845
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen pointed out that the quantum-mechanical description of "physical reality" implies an unphysical, instantaneous action between distant measurements. To avoid such an action at a distance. these three concluded that quantum mechanics had to be incomplete. However, its extensions involving additional "hidden variables," allowing for the recovery of determinism and locality, have been disproved experimentally (Bell's theorem). In this paper, an opposite solution of the paradox is presented, based on the greater indeterminism of the modem quantum field theory (QFT) description of particle physics, which pre vents the preparation of any state having a definite number of particles. The resulting uncertainty in photon radiation has interesting consequences in quantum information theory (e.g., cryptography and teleportation). Moreover, since it allows for fewer elements of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) physical reality than the old non-relativistic quantum mechanics, QFT satisfies the EPR condition of completeness without the need for hidden variables. The residual physical reality never violates locality; thus, the unique objective proof of "quantum nonlocality" is removed in an interpretation-independent way. At the same time, the supposed nonlocality of the EPR correlations turns out to be a problem in interpretation of the measurement process. If we do not rely on hidden variables or new physics beyond QFT, the viable interpretation is a minimal statistical one, which preserves locality and Lorentz symmetry. (C) 2003 MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica".
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 745
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Radiation pressure induced Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Giovannetti, V
    Mancini, S
    Tombesi, P
    EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2001, 54 (05): : 559 - 565
  • [42] THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX RE-EXAMINED
    SHARP, DH
    PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1961, 28 (03) : 225 - 233
  • [43] Metrological complementarity reveals the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Benjamin Yadin
    Matteo Fadel
    Manuel Gessner
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [44] EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX, STATISTICAL LOCALITY AND THE TIME-ENERGY UNCERTAINTY RELATION
    BISWAS, SN
    CHOUDHURY, SR
    DATTA, K
    PHYSICS LETTERS A, 1991, 153 (6-7) : 279 - 284
  • [45] On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using discrete time physics
    Riek, Roland
    8TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP DICE2016: SPACETIME - MATTER - QUANTUM MECHANICS, 2017, 880
  • [46] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox with quantum solitons in optical fibers
    Kozlov, VV
    Matsko, AB
    EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2001, 54 (05): : 592 - 598
  • [47] THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX AND THE PAULI EXCLUSION-PRINCIPLE
    OHARA, P
    FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS IN QUANTUM THEORY: A CONFERENCE HELD IN HONOR OF PROFESSOR JOHN A. WHEELER, 1995, 755 : 880 - 881
  • [48] Implications of the recent experimental realisation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Reid, MD
    EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 1996, 36 (01): : 1 - 6
  • [49] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen tachyons
    Bean, W. Clifton
    PHYSICS ESSAYS, 2009, 22 (03) : 246 - 267
  • [50] Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: From concepts to applications
    Reid, M. D.
    Drummond, P. D.
    Bowen, W. P.
    Cavalcanti, E. G.
    Lam, P. K.
    Bachor, H. A.
    Andersen, U. L.
    Leuchs, G.
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (04) : 1727 - 1751