Photon uncertainty solves the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

被引:2
|
作者
Tommasini, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Fis Aplicada, Area Fis Teor, Orense 32004, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1134/1.1576845
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen pointed out that the quantum-mechanical description of "physical reality" implies an unphysical, instantaneous action between distant measurements. To avoid such an action at a distance. these three concluded that quantum mechanics had to be incomplete. However, its extensions involving additional "hidden variables," allowing for the recovery of determinism and locality, have been disproved experimentally (Bell's theorem). In this paper, an opposite solution of the paradox is presented, based on the greater indeterminism of the modem quantum field theory (QFT) description of particle physics, which pre vents the preparation of any state having a definite number of particles. The resulting uncertainty in photon radiation has interesting consequences in quantum information theory (e.g., cryptography and teleportation). Moreover, since it allows for fewer elements of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) physical reality than the old non-relativistic quantum mechanics, QFT satisfies the EPR condition of completeness without the need for hidden variables. The residual physical reality never violates locality; thus, the unique objective proof of "quantum nonlocality" is removed in an interpretation-independent way. At the same time, the supposed nonlocality of the EPR correlations turns out to be a problem in interpretation of the measurement process. If we do not rely on hidden variables or new physics beyond QFT, the viable interpretation is a minimal statistical one, which preserves locality and Lorentz symmetry. (C) 2003 MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica".
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 745
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NEW LOOPHOLE FOR THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    FELDMANN, M
    FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1995, 8 (01) : 41 - 53
  • [22] EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX AND BELL INEQUALITIES
    DEBAERE, W
    ADVANCES IN ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRON PHYSICS, 1986, 68 : 245 - 336
  • [23] A NEW APPROACH TO THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    KAUFHERR, T
    FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 1985, 15 (10) : 1043 - 1051
  • [24] EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX - CALCULATION WITH PROPAGATORS
    PAYEN, R
    VIGOUREUX, JM
    LETTERE AL NUOVO CIMENTO, 1977, 20 (08): : 263 - 266
  • [25] Antiparticle in the light of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Klein paradox
    Ni, GJ
    Guan, H
    Zhou, WM
    Yan, J
    CHINESE PHYSICS LETTERS, 2000, 17 (06) : 393 - 395
  • [26] THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX IN THE BRAIN - THE TRANSFERRED POTENTIAL
    GRINBERGZYLBERBAUM, J
    DELAFLOR, M
    ATTIE, L
    GOSWAMI, A
    PHYSICS ESSAYS, 1994, 7 (04) : 422 - 428
  • [27] The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and SU(2) relativity
    O'Hara, Paul
    11TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM RELATIVISTIC DYNAMICS OF PARTICLES AND FIELDS, 2019, 1239
  • [28] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in single pairs of images
    Lantz, Eric
    Denis, Severine
    Moreau, Paul-Antoine
    Devaux, Fabrice
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2015, 23 (20): : 26472 - 26478
  • [29] Il Paradosso EPRThe Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
    Francesco De Martini
    Rendiconti Lincei, 2004, 15 (4):
  • [30] THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX FOR OBSERVABLES ENERGY TIME
    KLYSHKO, DN
    USPEKHI FIZICHESKIKH NAUK, 1989, 158 (02): : 327 - 341