Photon uncertainty solves the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

被引:2
|
作者
Tommasini, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Fis Aplicada, Area Fis Teor, Orense 32004, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1134/1.1576845
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen pointed out that the quantum-mechanical description of "physical reality" implies an unphysical, instantaneous action between distant measurements. To avoid such an action at a distance. these three concluded that quantum mechanics had to be incomplete. However, its extensions involving additional "hidden variables," allowing for the recovery of determinism and locality, have been disproved experimentally (Bell's theorem). In this paper, an opposite solution of the paradox is presented, based on the greater indeterminism of the modem quantum field theory (QFT) description of particle physics, which pre vents the preparation of any state having a definite number of particles. The resulting uncertainty in photon radiation has interesting consequences in quantum information theory (e.g., cryptography and teleportation). Moreover, since it allows for fewer elements of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) physical reality than the old non-relativistic quantum mechanics, QFT satisfies the EPR condition of completeness without the need for hidden variables. The residual physical reality never violates locality; thus, the unique objective proof of "quantum nonlocality" is removed in an interpretation-independent way. At the same time, the supposed nonlocality of the EPR correlations turns out to be a problem in interpretation of the measurement process. If we do not rely on hidden variables or new physics beyond QFT, the viable interpretation is a minimal statistical one, which preserves locality and Lorentz symmetry. (C) 2003 MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica".
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 745
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in a hybrid bipartite system
    Dabrowski, Michal
    Parniak, Michal
    Wasilewski, Wojciech
    OPTICA, 2017, 4 (02): : 272 - 275
  • [32] CAUSAL SUPERLUMINAL INTERPRETATION OF THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    CUFAROPETRONI, N
    VIGIER, JP
    LETTERE AL NUOVO CIMENTO, 1979, 26 (05): : 149 - 154
  • [33] GENERALIZED ABSORBER THEORY AND THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    CRAMER, JG
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1980, 22 (02): : 362 - 376
  • [34] CLASSICAL GEOMETRIC RESOLUTION OF THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX
    NEEMAN, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1983, 80 (22): : 7051 - 7053
  • [35] Macroscopic elements of reality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Univ of Queensland, Queensland
    Quant Semiclassical Opt J Eur Opt Soc Pt 2, 3 (489-499):
  • [36] Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Wiseman, H. M.
    Jones, S. J.
    Doherty, A. C.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (14)
  • [37] Macroscopic elements of reality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Reid, MD
    QUANTUM AND SEMICLASSICAL OPTICS, 1997, 9 (03): : 489 - 499
  • [38] Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Cavalcanti, E. G.
    Jones, S. J.
    Wiseman, H. M.
    Reid, M. D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 80 (03):
  • [39] EXTENSION OF THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX AND BELL THEOREM
    FRANSON, JD
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1982, 26 (04): : 787 - 800
  • [40] Radiation pressure induced Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
    Giovannetti, V
    Mancini, S
    Tombesi, P
    EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2001, 54 (05): : 559 - 565